Like others noted, this is a really vague question. I’ll assume you mean exceptionally brilliant or exceptionally beautiful.
Honestly, all four categories sound like a curse. I think the level of both intelligence and beauty most suited to happiness is a few notches above average. Extreme endowments usually turn into psychological baggage.
Obviously, being ugly - especially an ugly woman - is miserable. Feeling unattractive almost always equates feeling inferior. On the other hand, for many exceptionally beautiful women- especially for those who are “stupid” - their identity is almost entirely comprised in their physical appearance. The problem is that beauty is much more ephemeral than other traits. When those women hit 25, they have a small identity crisis, because that’s the age where physical bloom stops and your skin quality deteriorates. Age 30 is a huge crisis. And 40? I know (ex?)-beauties who don’t even know who they are by then.....lol there you go beautiful
-holy places (also known as shrines).
Answer:
The second metaphor is used in the first line as “out of the night that covers me.” Here night represents dark times and hardships of the poet. The third metaphor is in the third stanza “looms but the horror of the shade.” Here shade refers to unseen future or upcoming challenges.
It seems that you have missed the necessary options for us to choose from, so I had to look for it. Anyway, here is the answer. <span>Based on the lines of poetry directly after line 1, the best definition for luminous eyes in line 1 is BRIGHTLY EXPRESSIVE. Hope this answers your question. Have a great day!</span>