The statement the price of radio programming should fall is false.
<h3>What is Complements-in-consumption </h3>
Complements in consumption can be defined as the way in which two or more product complement each other when use of consume together or when use jointly.
Hence, Based on the scenario the statement is false because assuming the both music radio ,and concert are complements in consumption the price of radio programming will not fall.
Learn more about Complements in consumption here:brainly.com/question/12194202
#SPJ1
Answer:
$231,140
Explanation:
The computation of the amount reported in the cost of goods sold is shown below:
= Number of pool cues sold × total manufacturing cost per pool cue
where,
Number of pool cues sold would be 26,000 pool cues
And, the total manufacturing cost per pool cue would be
= Direct Materials per cue + Direct manufacturing Labor per cue + Manufacturing Overhead per cue
= $2 + $6 + $0.89
= $8.89
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would be equal to
= 26,000 cues × 8.89
= $231,140
Answer:
The correct answer is the option A: subject to intermediate scrutiny unlike political speech.
Explanation:
On the one hand, the <em>First Amendment to the United States Constitution</em> is the law that basically protects the rights of the people to have a free speech and moreover, establishes that the government can not intervene in an establishment of religion and prohibits the free exercise of religion.
On the other hand, the <em>Commercial Speech</em> under the First Amendment is seen as a particular case of speech due to the fact that this one can be harmful for the people and therefore can be fraudulent to them and in order to prevent that from happening the First Amendment does not protect so much the commercial speech and this last one is far more regulate it by the government than political speech.
Constitution has something called Bill of Rights which are your rights. Also, Supreme Court (Judicial branch) is there to interpret the laws. They can declare a law unconstitutional and all disputes between individual and government are settled in Supreme Court.
Answer:
$135000
Explanation:
Cole should record the patent at $135000. The intangible asset is recorded at the price at which it was purchased. Net carrying value of $160000 in the books of seller is not useful.
At the time of purchase of intangible asset, the fair value of stone stock exchanged was $45.
So the patent cost is =
3000 shares × $45 per share = $135000.
Cole should record the patent at this value.
