I believe the correct answer is Latifundium
The Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, commonly referred to as the linguistic relativity hypothesis, makes the claim that how one thinks about reality depends on the language one speaks.
<h3>What is the explanation for the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis?</h3>
According to the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, a person's language's grammatical and more verbal structure affects how they see the outside world. It stresses how language shapes or has an impact on one's thoughts. For instance, in other languages, various words have distinct meanings.
According to the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, one's thoughts are either determined by or influenced by language. In other words, depending on the language used to describe the world, people who speak various languages have different perspectives on it.
For more information about the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis refer to the link:
brainly.com/question/5695330
#SPJ1
Answer:
1
The action of Pfizer is no way near an ethical act and was a clear violation of the ethical standards.This is true because
- As it is the company responsibility to act ethically to achieve the goals of the society by eradicating their problems and not by enhancing them hence the corporate social responsibility would not allow the company to behave inhumanly
- The duty based ethics would also empower the corporation to care and respect humanity
- Its is highly unethical on the part of Pfizer to conduct test on human life.if we consider the six basic guidelines to make ethical decisions then they have done it in a highly unethical manner.The six basic guidelines would never allow any company to behave i such a manner so as to risk the human life
Pfizer did not obey any of the above ethical standards and the conduct was clear violation of ethical standard.
2
Pfizer plc is not guilty of any ethical standard violation as it is a common practice for drug manufacturer to conduct tests on animals as well as human.And anyways the company conducted the tests on those human beings who will die with the epidermic which has already invaded the entire country of Nigeria.Hence in other to save/protect a large number of human being the test on the few persons is ethical as it is done to protect the society at large
So we cannot say that the company had violated any ethical standard
3
In order for Pfizer to avert the consequences of the violation then Pfizer should use the following five steps to create solution tom problem on ethical question these steps include
- Inquiry : It is very crucial to make initial inquiry about the entire subject matter
- Discussion: If there is a list of action generated after inquiry then discussion on every single action should be made
- Decision : It is highly crucial to take any decision with the consensus of all the participating candidates
- Justification : Each decision made must have a justification for the entire process
- Evaluation : it is highly crucial to evaluate the entire process
Explanation:
Answer:
By nobody.
Explanation:
If a state law contradicts or violates what is stipulated by the US Constitution, it´s simply unconstitutional, it´s unviable. It will surely be objected in court , and if it makes it to the Supreme Court, it´ll surely be overturned.
<span>In the declaration of Independence, Jefferson refers
to natural rights as inalienable rights. It’s a right that cannot be taken away
that includes liberty, life and pursuit of happiness. Thomas Jefferson, the
author of the Declaration, fought for Human rights, which each and every one was
created by God as equal and is worthy to be treated equal also. Declaration of
independence happened on the 4th of July 1776, by the representative
of the United States of America. But it was actually July 2 1776,w hen
independence was approved.
</span>
