Answer:
A. that my answers
Explanation:
Jones and smith share the same cuvical in the officce. Jones loves to listen to music on his speakers while working. Smith is not able to concentrate on his work in the presence of music. Jones recieves benefits worth $200 regardless of whether he listen to music on his speakers or headphones. The cost of headphones is $50. SMith is not abke to conecentrate on his work and suffers damages worth $350 when Jones listens to music without his headphones. Smith does not suffer any damages when Jones listens to music on his headphones.
Suppose the office does not have any rules against listening to music on speakers while working. In thisâ case, if Jones and Smith do notâ communicate, the market outcome is that:
a. Jones continues to listen to music on his speakers; therefore, Smith is not able to concentrate on his work
b. Jones continues to listen to music on his speakers; however, Smith is able to concentrate on his work
c. Jones starts listening to music on headphones; therefore, Smith is able to concentrate on his work
d. Jones stops listening to music on his speakers; therefore, Smith is able to concentrate on his work
Answer:
analyzer
Explanation:
This strategy is used by companies wishing to gain market share. It is a moderate aggressive strategy, as it presents low aggregate risks, and innovation is not a very relevant factor in companies that use the analyzer strategy. Companies seek to provide a production of goods already in the market, with modifications and differentiations.
Answer:
C. a derived demand.
Explanation:
Derived demand is a rise in the demand of a product due to the increase in demand for related or intermediate goods. If two distinct goods or services are used together, a rise in the demand of one will cause the demand for the other to rise. Products or services used together are called complementary goods.
Derived demand is primarily as a result of the usage of a product in the production or consumption of other goods or services. In this case, the demand for workers is solely due to a rise in the demand for cars. Should the demand for vehicles decrease, then the demand for workers will fall.
Answer:
There was no contract since there was no mutual agreement on the shipping company.
Explanation:
For a contract to be enforceable, it is necessary to have proper offer and acceptance by the two parties. In this case, Strike made an offer and Bailey accepted the stated price but added that the shipping has to be done by Yellow Express Truck Line and not Dependable Truck. Since there was no agreement reached on the shipping company by both the parties, the contract isn't enforceable.
