If a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, is the outcome necessarily Pareto efficient if a policy change causes a Pareto improvement, then the outcome is not necessarily Pareto efficient this is because another change in the policy could cause another Pareto improvement.
A Pareto development is a development of a device whilst an alternative in the allocation of goods harms no person and advantages as a minimum one character. Pareto enhancements also are called "no-brainers" and are generally predicted to be rare, due to the plain and effective incentive to make any available Pareto development.
Factors that lie within the PPF display an inefficient or below-usage of resources – this is Pareto inefficient. A Pareto development way that output of both products can increase as we move from inside the PPF to factors at the PPF boundary.
Learn more about Pareto here:
brainly.com/question/7304310
#SPJ4
Answer:
839.216
Explanation:
For we to calculate the total cost, we use the following
Total Cost = Carrying Cost + Stock out Cost
= 0+ $45 x 4 x [.2(100-80)+.2(120-80)+.1(140-80)] = 1368*
Now
Total Cost = Carrying Cost + stock out Cost
Total cost= [10 x 20]+40 x 4 x [.2990-50-20)+.1(110-50-20)]
Total cost = 200-1115.216+4
Total cost = 839.216
Answer:
c
Explanation:
The federal reserve systems responsibilities include influencing the supply of money and credit to banks
Answer:
(B) the demand curve shifts leftward while the supply curve stays the same.
Explanation:
"Substitutes are goods where you can consume one in place of the other. The prices of complementary or substitute goods also shift the demand curve. When the price of a good that complements a good decreases, then the quantity demanded of one increases and the demand for the other increases. When the price of a substitute good decreases, the quantity demanded for that good increases, but the demand for the good that it is being substituted for decreases. "
Reference: Khan Academy. “Price of Related Products and Demand.” Khan Academy, Khan Academy, 2019
Answer:
The correct answer is A
Explanation:
The Cash payments for the month of may is computed as:
Cash payment = Cash balance on May 1 + Cash received during the month - Cash balance increased
where
Cash balance on May 1 is $30,000
Cash received during the month is $47,000
Cash balance increased is $33,000
Putting the values above:
Cash payments = $30,000 + $47,000 - $33,000
= $77,000 - $33,000
= $44,000
