Answer:
Juliet is not allowed to associate with Romeo because he is a Montague. If he had any other name it would be fine. She’s complaining that his name is meaningless. If the rose had any other name it would still be the same. So with Romeo; he would still be the same beautiful young man even if he had a different name. “What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet” Juliet knows that the blood feud prevents her from loving a Montague. She ponders it. It’s only your name that’s the enemy. You are what you are, even though you may be a Montague. What’s ‘Montague’? It isn’t hand or foot or arm or face or any other part belonging to a man. Oh I wish you had a different name. What is so special about a name? A rose, even if it were called something else, would smell just as sweet. So Romeo would still have all the perfection that he has, even if he were not called Romeo. Romeo, take off your name and in exchange for that whole name, which is not really a part of what you are, you can have all of me.
The sentence that best characterizes the street where kids play is;
- It is an evil place that corrupts youths with poor habits.
The description given of the street where the kids played is that of a dangerous environment that was not healthy for raising good kids.
Some of the kids that can be found there were wild and restless. Some were also rude.
Further insight into the condition of the street is seen when Lizzie's mother will not allow her to go play with the kids on the street because 'they play too much there and learn things that are not good for them'.
So, we can conclude that the environment was not a healthy one. It was evil and corruptive.
Learn more here:
brainly.com/question/12351557
thesis statement 1, would be my answer.
