The spending that would occur during the third round of spending if the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) was 0.6 will be $420 billion.
- Increase in expenditure = $700 billion.
- Marginal propensity to consume = 0.6
The amount of spending based on the information given will be:
= 0.6 × $700 billion
= $420 billion.
Therefore, the correct option is $420 billion.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/17012549
Answer:
effectiveness
Explanation:
<em>Effectiveness </em>is the essential pillar of business management. Commonly mistaken for efficacy, it isn't quite the same thing. Effectiveness is doing the right thing that helps achieve business goals, while efficacy is how the practice is performed, rationally using available resources. Since the example emphasizes Sanjay's plan that will help the company reach business goals, it is an effectiveness example.
Answer:
Option (C) is correct.
Explanation:
We have to use MM proposition that cost of equity will change itself in such a manner so that it can take care of its debt.
Cost of equity:
= WACC of all equity firm + (WACC of all equity - Cost of debt ) × (Debt -to-equity ratio)
At the beginning, when there was no debt,
WACC = cost of equity = 12 %
Levered cost of equity:
= 12% + ( 12% - 6%) × 0.5
= 15%
Therefore, Rearden's levered cost of equity would be closest to 15%.
Answer:
Randolph's basis in the distributed investment and land are as follows:
Investment = $10,000
Land = $23,000
Explanation:
The first step is that Randolph's basis in his RD Partnership interest of $48,000 is allocated to the distributed assets in an amount equal to the basis RD Partnership.
After this, Randolph will allocate remaining basis to assets which are not cash, hot assets and investment with unrealized appreciation.
Based on the above explanation, Randolph's basis in the distributed are as follows:
Cash = $15,000
Investment = Investment's Inside basis = $10,000
Land = Randolph's basis in his RD Partnership interest - Cash - Investment = $48,000 - $15,000 - $10,000 = $23,000
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": the price is relatively unimportant in allocating resources.
Explanation:
Centrally planned economies or command economies are those managed by the government that dictates production quotas and distribution levels and determines prices. Private ownership is null in centrally planned economies since the government is the owner and distributor of land, labor, and capital.
<em>Allocation price is irrelevant when it comes to command economies since only those vital goods such as staples are paid attention.</em>
