Answer: Tracking and identification.
Explanation: In other ease the woes and stress of such individual, integrating a tracking and identification capability on her app will be of great help. This will ensure that she could be easily and effectively located by leveraging the ability of the geographic positioning system in other to correctly get and know are current location. With these she could be picked easily when issues of drops off at the wrong location. Trackers allows one to determine the current location of items or individuals in which the tracking devices are placed on. As it also gives signals when one gets to the current position of the item or individual for proper identification. With these locating her will become very easy and hassle free during instances of wrong drop off.
The utilization of Polling has expanded because of innovation which makes it less expensive and more broadly utilized. policy makers also uses the polling to stay in contact with changing sentiments on the issues. Polling can have negative aspect in light of the fact that it makes the politicians more worried about getting the vote as opposed to taking the ethical stand.
Answer:
organizational commitment; perceived stress
Explanation:
Organizational commitment is the psychology of the employee towards his organization. This may be good and bad. If employee is happy with his work environment he will try to give the 100% of his job and its increases his working capacity. Employee think good about his organization and want stick with the organization passionately for a longer time. So they have low level of perceived stress.
According to the analysis, strong organizational commitment and reported low levels of perceived stress is the reason that stark industries was rated number one for job satisfaction.
Answer:
the three of them could be held personally liable:
- I. John
- II. John's manager
- III. The CEO, who in this specific case we assume could have prevented the crime.
Explanation:
John committed forgery and possibly fraud by forging clients' signatures on documents held by the company. His boss ordered him to do so, so he is also responsible for John's actions. John can even try to put all the blame on his boss alleging that he was forced to forge the signatures. The CEO of the firm is also responsible because the forged documents had to serve someone's illegal purposes, and the CEO probably was the one that needed them or knew about what was going on and didn't do anything to stop it.
