Answer:
$18,750
Explanation:
Present value (PV): $12,000
Tenor: 3 years
Future value (FV): $15,700
We have the formula:
FV = PV*(1+ annual rate) ^ number of year
15,700 = 12,000 * (1 + rate) ^3
-> Rate = (15,000/12,000)^(1/3) – 1 = 7.722%
If Sam invest in 6 year, the amount he expect to have is the future value in below calculation:
FV = 12,000 * (1+ 7.722%)^6 = 18,750
Answer & Explanation:
Assets = Capital + Liabilities
1) Investment Cash (+17...) (+17160)
2) Borrowings Cash (+7...) Loan (+7...)
3) Purchase Cash (-price paid) + Gain
Equip (+final price) (final - price paid)
4) Revenue Cash (+298...) Income (+298...)
5) Expense Cash (-210...) Expense (-210...)
3)* Price paid = 8700 or 8600 , Final price = 8300 or 7940 , Gain (Discount received) = 8700 - 8300 ie 400 (or) 8600 - 7940 = 660
Answer:
IRR = 8%
Don't accept the project
Explanation:
The internal rate of return is the discount rate that equates the after tax cash flows from an investment to the amount invested.
IRR can be calculated using a financial calculator:
Cash flow in year 0 = -9,187,846.67
Cash flow each year from year 1 to 11 = 1287000
IRR = 8%
Because the IRR is less than the hurdle rate, the project shouldn't be accepted.
To find the IRR using a financial calacutor:
1. Input the cash flow values by pressing the CF button. After inputting the value, press enter and the arrow facing a downward direction.
2. After inputting all the cash flows, press the IRR button and then press the compute button.
I hope my answer helps you
In this case, Ben should file complaints to: <span>Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
The </span><span>Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is federal agency of the United States that is created to protect the customers from potential malpractices within the private financial sectors (including companies who offer financial investing services)</span>
<span>McDonald v. Sante Fe Trail Transport (1976) was a Supreme Court case in which it was found that white citizens had standing to claim a violation of their civil rights when suffering disparate treatment compared to to a similarly situated black person. Appellate courts had previosly held that only racial minorities had standing to make claims of racial discrimination. In reversing this finding, the Supreme Court established the principle that the civil rights protections prohibited all discrimination based on race whether or not the subject of discrimination belonged to a racial minority.</span>
