Answer and Explanation:
The Statement showing the amount and the timing of all the cash Flow of Burger is shown below:-
Year Particulars Amount
0 Cost of new machine ($176,300)
0 Additional installation cost of new machine ($3,275)
0 Sales of old machine $13,150
1-3 Savings in overhaul cost of old machine $11,550
1-10 Saving in variable cost $25,800
(258,000 × ($11.90 - $11.80)
10 Salvage value of new machine $3,730
The common arguments that are in favor of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) are:
Public image of the company.
Moral Justification.
Public Support for business.
Long run survival of the organization and the public both.
Common arguments that go against CSR are:
Ambiguity in business policies.
Moral Responsibility.
Shareholders' rights
Explanation:
Against
The public should perceive the company as their savior and not their enemy. CSR helps a company stay in the good books of the public. If a cigarette manufacturing company opens a profit free farm or a recreational park for the public, it will ensure the maintenance of a positive image.
Morally, when a company takes something from the public e.g their clean air, or clean environment, then morally the company is bound to give something in return e.g a water filtration plant.
CSR can lead the public to support the company during times of need. A company during tough times might get several volunteers if it is known to have given much to the public.
Co-dependence is essential for the survival of both the organization and the public. Companies excel if the public likes them. If a company has been known to have only take and never give, then the balance is disturbed.
Against:
Not every company has the resources or interest to focus on one problem. Therefore, ambiguous policies of different organizations lead to partial working on one social issue or environmental issue. it leads the problem to be partially solved and not completely eliminated.
Company might morally owe the public in some domain but might not have the resources to fix that particular problem. It may leave the company in a moral debt. In order to compensate, a company may go beyond its capabilities which will not result in mutual benefit. Only one party will be happy.
CSR activities require resources. A company has several stakeholders and all might nit agree to spending/donating their profits for CSR activities. This may sound 'selfish' but public doesn't always know what the stakeholders are going through. CSR in such a case may deprive a stakeholder from a fraction of his share of profit.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
All PBM´s manuals and third.party payer contracts require that participating pharmacies collect deductibles, copays or coinsurance amounts.
Answer:
The correct option is (B) $365,530.
Explanation:
In this problem we need to determine the future value, i.e. the amount at the retirement age.
The formula to commute the future value is:
![\\ FV=A[\frac{(1+r)^{n}-1}{r}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5C%20FV%3DA%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2Br%29%5E%7Bn%7D-1%7D%7Br%7D%5D)
Here,
A = annual investment = $5,000
r = interest rate = 8%
n = number of periods = 25
The future value is:
![\\ FV=A[\frac{(1+r)^{n}-1}{r}]\\=5000\times[\frac{(1+0.08)^{25}-1}{0.08}]\\=365529.699\\\approx365530](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5C%5C%20FV%3DA%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2Br%29%5E%7Bn%7D-1%7D%7Br%7D%5D%5C%5C%3D5000%5Ctimes%5B%5Cfrac%7B%281%2B0.08%29%5E%7B25%7D-1%7D%7B0.08%7D%5D%5C%5C%3D365529.699%5C%5C%5Capprox365530)
Thus, the amount of money the engineer will have in the account at retirement is $365,530.
Answer:
Journal Entry
01 July Debit Investment $240 million Credit Bank $200 million Credit Discount on investment $40 million
31 Dec Debit Bank $7,2 Million Debit Discount on Bond $0.8 million Credit Interest Income $8 million
Debit Fair Value loss on investment $30 million Credit Investment $30 million
Explanation:
Interest is received semiannually
6%/2 = 3%
interest = $240 million * 3% =7,200,000
8%/2 = 4%
Interest market $200 million * 4% =8,000,000
Fair value loss = 240 million - 210 million
= 30 million loss because cost is greater than fair value
