The parallelogram<span>, rectangle, and </span>square<span> all have two pairs of parallel sides </span>
Answer:
51 % batting percentage
Step-by-step explanation:
The result of the respective questions are:
- This chi-square test only takes into consideration one variable.
- The type of chi-square test this is is a Goodness of Fit
- df= 3
- NO
<h3>How many variables are involved in the chi-square test?</h3>
a)
This chi-square test only takes into consideration one variable.
b)
The type of chi-square test this is, is a Goodness of Fit
To test the hypothesis, we must determine whether the actual data conform to the assumed distribution.
The "Goodness-of-Fit" test is a statistical hypothesis test that determines how well the data that was seen resembles the data that was predicted.
c)
Parameter
n = 4
Therefore
Degrees of freedom
df= n - 1
df= 4 - 1
df= 3
d)
In conclusion
Parameters

df = 3
Hence
Critical value = 7.814728
Test statistic = 6.6
Test statistic < Critical value, .
NO, the result of this test is not statistically significant.
Read more about Probability
brainly.com/question/11234923
#SPJ1
The correct answer is 3/8
Rewriting our equation with parts separated
1+7/8−6/4
Solving the fraction parts
7/8 - 6/4?
Find the LCD of 7/8 and 6/4 and rewrite to solve with the equivalent fractions.
LCD = 8
7/8−1 2/8=−58
7
8
−
12
8
=
−
5
8
Combining the whole and fraction parts
1−5/8=3/8
Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
<h3>Complete question</h3>
Beth says that the graph of g(x)=x-5+1 is a translation of 5 units to the left and 1 unit up of f(x) = x. She continues to explain that the point (0,0) on the square root function would be translated to the point (-5,1) on the graph of g(x). Is Beth's description of the transformation correct? Explain
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The functions are given as:
g(x) = x - 5 + 1
f(x) = x
When the function f(x) is translated 5 units left, we have:
f(x + 5) = x + 5
When the above function is translated 1 unit up, we have:
f(x + 5) + 1 = x + 5 + 1
This means that the actual equation of g(x) should be
g(x) = x + 5 + 1
And not g(x) = x - 5 + 1
By comparison;
g(x) = x - 5 + 1 and g(x) = x + 5 + 1 are not the same
Hence, Beth's description of the transformation is incorrect
Read more about transformation at:
brainly.com/question/17121698
#SPJ1