Answer:
A is the correct answer I think hope this helps
Answer:
It should be greater than $36
Explanation:
The opportunity cost of working is the amount of money sacrificed or could have earned if the individual was not working. In this case, Claire has decided to go with her friend which means that the opportunity cost of not working is less than the benefits receives from going out. Because she is not working it means that the opportunity cost of working is more than 36 dollars, which is the income she could have earned in 3 hours.
NOTE: Your question isn't clear, Johnson. Would you mind checking it and writing it in a way you can be better helped?
Meanwhile, I hope these explanation below helps.
Answer and Explanation:
Two goods are said to be complementary goods if an increase in the price of a particular one leads to a commensurate decrease in the demand that buyers placed for the other one.
A good is said to be a normal good if the reason for an increase in demand is due to an increase in the income of the buyers.
A good is said to be an inferior good if there is a decrease in demand even though the buyers have experienced increase in their income.
Answer:
$15.64
Explanation:
first we must determine the market value of the bond without the warrants:
PV of face value = $1,000 / (1 + 3.5%)⁵⁰ = $179.05
PV of coupon payments = $25 x 23.45562 (PV annuity factor, 3.5%, 50 periods) = $586.39
market value = $765.44
the market value of the 15 warrants = $1,000 - $765.44 = $234.56
market value per warrant = $234.56 / 15 = $15.64
Answer:
a. Incremental analysis.
b. Sunk cost.
c. Relevant information.
d. Opportunity cost.
e. Joint products.
f. Out-of-pocket cost.
g. Split-off point.
Explanation:
a. Incremental analysis: examination of differences between costs to be incurred and revenue to be earned under different courses of action.
b. Sunk cost: a cost incurred in the past that cannot be changed as a result of future actions. Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered.
c. Relevant information: costs and revenue that are expected to vary, depending on the course of action decided on. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
d. Opportunity cost: the benefit foregone by not pursuing an alternative course of action. Opportunity cost also known as the alternative forgone, can be defined as the value, profit or benefits given up by an individual or organization in order to choose or acquire something deemed significant at the time.
e. Joint products: products made from common raw materials and shared production processes.
f. Out-of-pocket cost: a cost yet to be incurred that will require future payment and may vary among alternative courses of action.
g. Split-off point: the point at which manufacturing costs are split equally between ending inventory and cost of goods sold. Thus, it give rise to joint products that emerge from the same raw materials and a shared manufacturing process.