Answer:
The team earns $405 in revenue for each game and $2430 revenue each season. With total costs of $3300 each season, the team finishes the season with $ -870 of profit
Explanation:
TEAM EARNS $ 10 FOR EACH TICKET AND 30 PEOPLE ATTEND A GAME AND SPEND $7 ON CONCESSION STAND BUT TEAM RECEIVE ONLY $ 3.5 OUT OF THIS SO
PER CUSTOMER REVENUE OF TEAM= $13.5
TOTAL REVENUE PER GAME = 13.5 * 30= $405
FOR A SEASON OF 6 GAMES, TOTAL REVENUE= 405* 6=$2430
PROFIT = REVENUE- COST= 2430- 3300 = -870 $
THAT MEANS LOSS OF 870 $
The team earns $405 in revenue for each game and $2430 revenue each season. With total costs of $..3300...... each season, the team finishes the season with $ -870 of profit or loss of $870
Answer:
The correct answer is d) A deduction from net income in determining cash flows from operating activities.
Explanation:
To get net cash flow using the indirect method we must make adjustments to the net income.
It depends on the account if it is added or subtracted to net income.
In this case, an increase in available-for-sale securities due to an increase in their fair value should be reported as a deduction from net income.
The Parent taxpayer is entitled to the earned income credit
<u>Explanation:</u>
The federal income tax credit or income credit in the United States is a refundable tax credit, particularly those with children, for low- to moderate-income working individuals and couples. The EITC benefit amount depends on the income of the recipient and the number of children.
The EITC benefits low to reasonable-income parents but offers very little assistance to workers without eligible children (often referred to as childless workers). Income tax credit (EITC). Workers earn a loan up to a limit of one percent of their income.
The answer in the space provided is the buyback clause. The
buyback clause is a sort of contract that has provision in which the seller has
rights of having to purchase his or her own property with the use of rules or
conditions.
Answer:
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.
Explanation:
For the purpose of this Decision,
Benefit of processing further = Sales Value after processing – Sale Value before processing – Further Processing costs
Cost of acquiring trees is a sunk cost already incurred and hence is not relevant
Hence, benefit of processing = (0.80-0.20)*350 – 50
= $160
Hence, the answer is
c. It should process further because the reduction in the cost of the trees is irrelevant.