Answer:
Steve has no legal recourse against Jonathan but he can try to take action against Knell Watches.
Explanation:
The entrustment rule says that entrusting goods to a seller who deals in goods of that kind, gives that seller the power to transfer those goods and all rights to a buyer in the ordinary course of business. Entrusting includes giving your goods to the seller and leaving goods that have already been bought with the seller, with the intention of picking the goods up or having them delivered at a later stage.
Here Steve cannot claim back his watch from Jonathan because he gave the watch to Knell Watches willingly. Jonathan also bought the watch from Kevin in good faith, he had no idea that the watch had been stolen from Knell. Kevin sold the watch to him in good faith and he had no reason to doubt that the watch really belonged to Kevin because they are friends. if, however, someone else had taken the watch in to Knell Watches on behalf of Steve, then he would be able to get the watch back from Jonathan but he can't now because he took the watch in himself. Knell was also deceived by Kevin and so Jonathan is protected because of that according to Uniform Commercial Code.
Answer:
C) both are tied to nonverbal communication
Explanation:
edgeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Answer:
The description of the given question is described in the explanation section below.
Explanation:
A day, my child said, "You're very much loud as well as disturbing." When he was on the mobile device, I told him an interesting issue. He posted this comment just after the mobile. It was bullying me.
- I have worked hard with my families all my existence. I have always provided about my child and just never refused any of his requests. I rarely gave him any sort of frustration or frustration. He's founded right now, and I've done all for his government. I figured my son was going to appreciate my commitment.
- And therefore his demeaning speaking upset me. I couldn't contain myself, so I was curious about what I had in my life to do with such selfish commitment to my career. Although he posted this statement, there has been a tone of frustration, negligence, disrespect, negligence, respectively. It confirms, of course, that he created this remark to harm me.
- I had been so stunned I was lost for words. I was complaining to my wife. But it wasn't that bad. I walked out the door from him because he dropped into one room. I was always realizing that my entire career was pointless.
Answer:
the most popular and most number best country in