1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ilia_Sergeevich [38]
4 years ago
9

The pOH of a solution is 6.0 . Which statement is correct ?

Social Studies
2 answers:
AlekseyPX4 years ago
8 0
It is answer B.(<span>All organisms that cannot synthesize their food by means of photosynthesis or chemosynthesis are heterotrophic.)</span>
Sonja [21]4 years ago
3 0
The question is asking which statement is correct if the pOH of a solution is 6.0. The potential of Hydrogen ( or pH ) specifies the acidity or the basicity of an aqueous solution. With pH less than 7 solutions are acidic and with pH greater than 7 they are basic. But pOH is a measure of the concentration of hidroxide ions. Also: pOH + pH = 14. Therefore: pH = 14 - 6.0 = 8.0. For pH = 8.0 this solution is the weak base. Answer: the weak base<span>.</span>
You might be interested in
PLZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ HELPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP I BEGGING YOU THIS
marishachu [46]

Answer:

Most of the settled lands of Canada, in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and Alberta, were transferred from First Nations to the Crown (the Government) through treaties.   Today both sides agree that the so-called Indian Treaties are agreements between the Crown (the Government) and First Nations, in which the First Nations exchanged some of their interests in specific areas of their ancestral lands in return for various kinds of payments and promises from Crown officials. However, each side has a different interpretation of what was intended by the agreements. The Canadians (British) and the First Nations were at the same meetings, listened to the same speeches (translated) and signed the same pieces of paper. Yet they had (and still have) two totally different concepts of what the treaties were about, and what each side was promising. The differences in understanding are rooted in two totally different world views, and two totally different concepts of land ownership, and two colliding purposes. The concept of private ownership of land by an individual, who could build a fence and keep others out forever, was totally foreign to First Nations people. First Nations had an oral tradition. They passed down important information by the spoken word during important ceremonies and at celebrations. What was said was what was important to them, not what was written on paper. Though they did not have a written tradition, in the European sense, they recorded important events by sewing beaded wampum belts. Wampum belts signifying treaties became sacred objects that were brought out at certain times, Then elders recited the terms and understandings of the agreement commemorated by that ceremonial wampum belt. The Government View of Treaties The First Nations View of Treaties The British and Canadian governments saw treaties as a way to legalize the ceding of Indian lands to clear the way for European settlement, mining, and railways. Treaties were intended to extinguish all First Nations claims and rights to their land forever, except in those lands set apart as Reserves of land for the bands to live on.   In return, the government would make a one-time payment to the bands, plus a specified annual sum. As well, treaties had terms dealing with hunting and fishing rights, as well as education and health care. Treaties were also intended to offer the Indians some protection from the consequences of new settlement, and some assistance in adapting to new ways of living as the old ways became less feasible. Treaties were also expected to be the first step towards assimilation. Government expected First Nations people to give up their culture, including their customs, their language, their religious beliefs, their ceremonies, and everything else that differentiated them from Canadians of British origin. also Nations saw treaties in a different light. To them, treaties were solemn pacts establishing the future basis of relations between their people, for whom Canada is an ancient homeland, and the new Government of Canada and its people and Nations representatives signed the treaties to ensure that they would receive some government assistance in the future to ensure the survival of their people. They believed (because all the Treaty Commissioners told them so) that they would be cherished and protected by the Crown with whom they had a special relationship.  

Explanation:

Hope this helps :)

7 0
3 years ago
EXPLAIN WHAT YOU UNDERSTOOD ABOUT SILK ROUTE
goldenfox [79]

Answer:

What Is the Silk Route?

The Silk Route was a historic trade route that dated from the second century B.C. until the 14th century A.D. It stretched from Asia to the Mediterranean, traversing China, India, Persia, Arabia, Greece, and Italy.

It was dubbed the Silk Route because of the heavy silk trading that took place during that period. This valuable fabric originated in China, which initially had a monopoly on silk production until the secrets of its creation spread. In addition to silk, the route facilitated the trade of other fabrics, spices, grains, fruits and vegetables, animal hides, wood and metal work, precious stones, and other items of value.

hope you like it (° U °)

8 0
4 years ago
I'll mark the brainliest! Help please!
NeX [460]
Locks on any canal are used only for A. Locks are gates that block off sections of water—they are used to move boats from one body of water to another when the heights are different. The boat approaches from one side of the canal. One gate is opened while the other is shut, and the boat goes in. Then both are shut, and the water level is lowered or raised to equal the other side of the canal. The other gate is then opened, and the boat goes out.
8 0
3 years ago
Explain why some consumer goods were in short supply during the war.
bazaltina [42]
They where used in the war or they cam from the place they where at war with.
7 0
3 years ago
Using the knowledge you've accumulated in this course, write a short letter to the editor of your local newspaper arguing why or
Ivenika [448]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Mr. John Smith

News Editor

The Sun New

Present

Dear Mr. Smith,

I have read the news about the removal of the statue from State Park. Yes, for some was a symbol of diversity. For others, was a threat of traditional values of conservative America.

I just want to share my perspective because I think we as a society, and you as a newspaper, are missing the central point.

The statute could or could not be a symbol of diversity or against the traditional values of our community. It is just a statue. People are the ones who gave it so much importance and meaning.

What should be of our concern is the attitude of the local government against the actions and rights of minority groups, many of them that represent a complete form of expression in our society.

I am not against them or in favor of them. I am just demanding respect for them. They have the right to express themselves, something that the government has not allowed them to do. They have the right to be members of our society in every part of it, and the government is not hearing their claims about a lack of opportunities. They had been aggressively insulted, and the government has done nothing, and the news minimizes the incidents.

So, it is not a matter od a statue, it is a matter of the real actions we are doing against people that do not think like us but deserve respect.

Dear Mr. Smith, I hope you can reflect on this I change the way you cover this news.

Thank you for your attention

Sincerely,

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Is it ok to not wear retainer for one night?
    11·1 answer
  • What body of water lies southeast of India
    14·1 answer
  • How equality between the sexes shaped human society
    6·1 answer
  • Joey was rollerblading without a helmet and landed on his head. In the last two weeks since the accident, he has not been doing
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a main economic variable that affects business cycles?
    11·1 answer
  • Why material removal processes (milling, turning, etc.) are used as secondary process after a primary process (casting, forging,
    5·1 answer
  • Mrs. Rodriquez thinks that Byron, a student with a physical disability, should have surgery so that he can use special equipment
    5·1 answer
  • What region is i Athens?
    11·1 answer
  • Write an editorial on "Present condition of human rights".​
    11·1 answer
  • What type of government does Japan have?!?!?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!