The ethics trap that is faced here would be contemplating to accept the reallocation because rejecting it may mean trouble and even lead to a lose of our jobs.
<h3>What is meant by ethical trap?</h3>
This is the term that has to do with the circumstances that may lead an individual to do away with the core values and the principles that they have. The trap here is that I may lose my job or may not have any bonus but accepting is going against the ethics and the values that I may hold special.
What should have been in this situation would have been to come clean in the first place so as to avoid going against ethics and the principles of the profession. The best way to do this would be to go to the head of division and explain the situation at hand to him.
Hence we can say that The ethics trap that is faced here would be contemplating to accept the reallocation because rejecting it may mean trouble and even lead to a lose of our jobs.
Read more on ethics here:
brainly.com/question/13969108
#SPJ1
Answer:
$66,000
Explanation:
The $60,000 paid as last month's rent will be reported as an asset, prepaid rent, and the deposit of $80,000 will be reported as an asset, deposits. The new walls and offices costing $360,000 will be capitalized as leasehold improvements and amortized over the 5-year term of the lease. Amortization will be $72,000 per year or $6,000 per month. As a result, Tell will report expenses in 20X0 of $60,000 in rent and $6,000 in amortization for a total of $66,000.
Answer:
The answer is "15 minutes"
Explanation:
I will approximately spend 15 minutes on prewriting once i have gathered the information needed.
Answer:
$180 billion
Explanation:
The consumption is an act of spending the money from an income. The marginal propensity to consume is the proportion increase in the amount that a consumer is spending. The savings then decline if the consumption increases. In the given scenario the consumption will not raise even if there is an increase in national income and taxes are kept fixed at previous level. This is because marginal propensity to consume is same.
Answer:
a. It is not a fair deal for me.
The question is how much is $1,000 today when received in 12 months' time from now. The present value of $1,000 at 5% effective interest rate is $952 ($1,000 * 0.952). The other repayment of $1,100 in 2 years' time from now is worth $997.70 today at the 5% effective interest rate. This implies that my friend is repaying me $1,949.70 in present value terms.
For friendship sake, I may lend her the money, but in economic analysis terms, the NPV value will yield a negative value of $50.30 ($2,000 - $1,949.70). My friend is not actually paying me back the amount I would lend to her. She is paying me less than I actually would lend to her.
b. Cash Flow Diagram:
Year 1 Year 2
F1 F2
$1,000 $1,100 (Inflows)
Fo⇵.................⇵.......................⇵...........................⇵n period
Year 0
$2,000 (outflows)
Explanation:
The cash flow diagram for this loan is the graphical representation of the timing of the cash flows with a clear marking of the repayments made by my best friend in two instalments and the $2,000 that I lent to her. This cash flow diagram presents the flow of cash as arrows on a timeline scaled to the magnitude of the cash flow, where outflows are down arrows and inflows are up arrows.
The Net present value (NPV) of this loan shows the difference between the present value of repayments by my best friend and the present value of $2,000 that I lent to her over a period of 2 years. To obtain this difference, the present values of cash inflows of $1,000 in a year's time and $1,100 in two years' time are determined using the discount factor table based on the given interest rate of 5%.