False, because you could have the world's best character and still have problems and tragedies that you didn't deserve.
<span>The nuns are a foil for Sunny--that whole mother contrast. Holden is looking for a connection with anyone, yet he doesn't find it with either side of that equation. </span>
<span>Holden has regard for others? Yeah. So what? That doesn't contribute much to Salinger's purpose here. Holden seeks connection. He also seeks to find (and preserve) something pure in a corrupt world. That should be the focal point of your analysis of his interaction with these types of characters in the </span>novel<span>. </span>
C hope this helps you in the long run
We can infer here that what actually happened to Ned is that Mr. Reamer angrily carried him up to beat him up. If I am in Ned's shoes, I will be ashamed.
<h3>What is inference?</h3>
Inference actually refers to the conclusion that one arrives to after evaluating the available and necessary evidences. Inference is known to be reached after observation and experiments have been cried out.
We see here the way Mr. Reamer picked Ned shows that he was angry with what Ned said in Navajo.
If one is in Ned's shoes, such person will be ashamed. This is because such act looks insulting. Mr. Reamer, as stated in the passage is seen to be angry and to have to carry Ned like a puppy.
Learn more about inference on brainly.com/question/25913650
#SPJ1
It should be C the others really don’t make any sense
