The case of Jones v. Mayer upheld the 1866 civil rights act and the 13th Amendment :)
Brainliest answer please?
Answer:
A key aspect of the process was restricting Native Americans to reservations ... if the children were separated from their parents' influence. ... by the federal government, Christian education and conversion were part of the mission. ... Native-American religious practices can still come into conflict with U.S.
Explanation:
The answer is the first option, the pursuit of happiness.
—Evidence—
that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
He was a communist dictator right on the home front, an enemy in our front yard, we also needed cuba economically and he was definitely not on our side.
Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
