I believe that the answer is compass because it does show direction, unlike the other answer choices. Hope this helps! :)
Answer:
it is b
Explanation:
i ddi the test on edge lol we all seriously just copy and paste
Jews during World War II took on a number of different roles during World War II in attempting to deal with the horrors of the Holocaust and the Nazis. Some Jews attempted to hide, others sought to flee and migrate to other countries, some took up arms and attempted to resist, and others attempt to change their identity not to be persecuted for being Jewish.
Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another. This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.
John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience. Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.
Further explanation:
Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people. But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.
Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em> in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War. He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result. Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.
John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England. Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings. Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.
In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way. If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way. Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved. Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith. But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke. :-)
Answer:
Hoy en día, por causa del coronavirus, en muchos países del mundo se están soslayando gran cantidad de derechos civiles con el objetivo de preservar el correcto funcionamiento del sistema sanitario pero sin tener en consideración las cuestiones relativas al ejercicio de esos derechos por parte de los ciudadanos.
Así, en muchos países del mundo la libertad de circulación se ha visto gravemente cercenada, violando incluso preceptos constitucionales que impiden el cercenamiento del derecho a circular y trabajar. Por ejemplo, en Argentina la cuarentena ha hecho que millones de personas no hayan podido trabajar durante mas de dos meses, llevando a la quiebra a muchas pequeñas empresas y elevando notoriamente el desempleo.
Por otra parte, los hospitales han entrado en un estado de saturación, y las autoridades están seleccionando los casos a ser atendidos, dejando de lado cuestiones consideradas menores o no inminentes. Esto es absolutamente violatorio del derecho a la salud, garantizado por gran cantidad de tratados internacionales de derechos humanos.
Incluso, en muchos países han habido detenciones policiales arbitrarias por circulación considerada ilegal, lo cual es contrario a los regímenes de derecho penal ya que se detiene y enjuicia a personas por delitos no legislados.
Como puede verse, es necesario un fuerte control sobre los gobiernos, para que los derechos mencionados sean respetados y no se vulneren las garantías de las que gozan los ciudadanos.
