Answer:
The answer is because people should know who is coming into office, but they do not have the right to know why someone is being fired for private reasons.
Explanation:
It’s important for the hiring discussion to be made public by the city council since it relates to the use of public funds to compensate these additional workforces. In contrast, firing processes do not relate to incurring funds and thus the public does not need to know about the reasons of the firing.
No, i don't believe so.
Even though it is very true that more and more prefer buying things online rather than personally coming to stores, there are some products that simply couldn't be observed without consumers being physically there.
For example, The housing and cars business will always require personal selling
Option 4 , All the above
Explanation:
After a listing has expired, the original listing broker may be paid a commission under the terms of the holdover clause in the original contract if :
- the broker had worked with the purchaser before the expiration date
- the broker had disclosed the name of the purchaser to the sellers before the listing expired
- the broker was the procuring cause for the purchaser
The broker who listed the property will receive a commission, regardless of who sells the property. The vendor lists another agent after the listing expires, and the buyer's agent submits an offer to the property.
Answer:
Option C $450,000 decrease
Explanation:
The reason is that the cost to buy the shares in the market is lower than $50 per share so buying the shares at $50 per share is not benefiting the directors at all. This means that the liability which was calculated using the black scholes model was standing at $1350,000 for 3 years and $450,000 for a single year will not be waived off because the directors didn't exercised the option and are taking money benefits which means under fair value method the net income will decrease by $450,000 because this is the amount paid to directors.
Answer:
Option A. The UCC because it is a mixed contract predominately for the sale of goods.
Explanation:
The Universal Commercial Code deals with all the transactions that are connected with the transaction of goods that have physical existence. If the transaction also includes the share of services which forms part of contract and are minor in amount then it is also governed by the UCC otherwise it is out of the scope of the Universal Commercial Code.
In the given question, transactions are predominantly for purchase of goods which also includes the installation service is within the scope of UCC.
Furthermore, if the mixed contract was predominantly for services then it is out of the scope of UCC. So the right answer is option A.
