I'm guessing it is B because it doesn't have enough information. My reasoning is because: Just because you are buying a house doesn't mean you have kids or will have kids, and if you don't elementary school wouldn't be a factor you will consider
hope this helps
Answer:
A
Explanation:
When we talk about franchising then it comes with high cost and fee. Firstly, the franchisee need to fulfill certain requirements like specified space, Dining capacity etc. Then franchisee needs pay franchise fee. So to fulfil the specific requirements to attain the franchise, the cost is high. Franchisor, to maintain the brand name apply certain specific requirements on number of diners, space, type of dishes etc. They all comes with high cost. Also the franchise fee will be high as written in question that its successful fast food chain.
After business starts, the franchisee needs to pay certain amount to franchisor every month in terms of ROYALITY.
So, WHen we talk about franchise it comes with high cost.
Answer:
$58,002.60
Explanation:
First, it is clear to include the $21,000 as part of the value of the equipment.
Now, the $9,000 annual payment after every year for six years need to be presented in its present value, meaning what is the value of those future amounts of $9,000 on June 30, 2018.
To calculate the present value of annuity (annuity means constant and equal payments) for those 6 payments of $9,000, we would need the Present Value Factor which is supplied from the Present Value Table.
Looking at 12% for 6 periods ("six annual installments") on the table, it gives the PV factor of 4.1114.
Just multiply $9,000 by 4.1114 and we get 37,002.60
Finally add the downpayment of $21,000 with the present value $37,002.60 and we would get the total value of the equipment of 58,002.60
Which of the following is an example of irregular income?
A. A full-time job
B. A part-time job
C. A graduation gift
D. Both b and c
The answer is C
The proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given below:
<h3>Scenario 1</h3>
He would say that the pricing system should remain the main determinant of the market and the interference of the government was uncalled for.
<h3>Scenario 2</h3>
He would side with the free market system and be an opponent of the law that frowns on importation.
<h3>Scenario 3</h3>
He would support the suspension of the antitrust laws.
<h3>Scenario 4</h3>
He would believe that markets should not be regulated and the free market system should continue.
<h3>Who is Adam Smith?</h3>
He is the father of modern economics for his work in pioneering ideas such as free trade and the gross domestic product
Hence, we can see that the proposed response of Adam Smith based on each scenario is given above.
Read more about Adam Smith here:
brainly.com/question/50
#SPJ1