1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Genrish500 [490]
3 years ago
14

What countries do you think might offer some strategic advantage to the Nazis based on their location? Explain your answer. Plea

se I need a answer right now
Social Studies
1 answer:
Alexus [3.1K]3 years ago
7 0


First thing that comes to mind is Russia had a strategic advantage to the Nazis. The Russian military knew the terrain (I believe it was mountainous) and the cold climate helped push back the Nazis. The Nazis actually tried to get into Russia.  That was the only country I could think of.

Most countries, I think did not have the military power to stop Hitler/Nazis from invading them.


Hopefully this helps.



You might be interested in
What were the 5 foods that went from the Old world to the New world
Nana76 [90]
There were more than 5 foods that took part in the Columbian Exchange and travelled from the Old to the new World.

Some examples are: Cytrus fruits (lemons, oranges), bananas, apples, cofee, onion, rice, peach, olive  carrot,  garlic, sugarcane and watermelon

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You blame your poor performance on a test that you didn't study for on all the other work you had to do. the defense mechanism t
FrozenT [24]
I believe the answer is: Rationalization

In psychology, rationalization refers to the act of justifying negative behaviors/outcome in your life even if the justification is inappropriate.
This action often being done by someone who are not willing to face the truth and refused to held accountable for the outcome that happened in their life.
7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a role of industrial hygienists? a) Determining the extent of employee exposure to hazards b) Trai
lana [24]

Answer:

b) Training employees on the recognition of hazards

Explanation:

Including the ones in the previous list (except for b), the roles of industrial hygienists are:

  • To investigate and examine the workplace in search of hazards and possible dangers and develop techniques for their control and prevention.
  • To recommend basics for the improvement of workers' safety and the people around them and control that they are respecting the principles of safety and health.
  • To carry out research to give workers information about potentially dangerous conditions in the place where they work.
  • To advise members of the government and take part in the elaboration of regulations to guarantee safety and health for workers and their families.
8 0
3 years ago
What can be your role to develop Positive Thinking towards elder citizen ​
olasank [31]

Answer:

Moderate daily exercise is an excellent way of reducing stress, maintaining a healthy weight, strengthening aging bones and improving attitude. Different techniques work for different people, but many have found practices such as meditation, yoga, tai chi, walking, prayer and deep breathing exercises to be helpful

Explanation:

I hope that help u

3 0
3 years ago
How does previous political experience and perceived perception by American voters influence elections?
HACTEHA [7]

Answer:

When asked which statement comes closer to their own views, most Americans (58%) say that “voting gives people like me some say about how government runs things,” while fewer (39%) say “voting by people like me doesn’t really affect how government runs things.”

The public is somewhat more skeptical when it comes to the ability of ordinary citizens to influence the government in Washington. Half (50%) say ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort, while about as many (47%) say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do to influence the government.

Can ordinary people have an impact?

Majorities of Democrats and Democratic leaners as well as of Republicans and Republican leaners say that voting gives people some say in government, though this view is somewhat more widely held among Democrats (63%) than Republicans (56%).Those with more education are more likely to say voting gives them a voice in government

Democrats are similarly more likely than Republicans to say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington: 55% of Democrats say ordinary citizens can make an impact, while 42% say there is not much ordinary people can do. About as many Republicans and leaners say ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington (47%) as say there’s not much ordinary citizens can do (51%).

Among the 13% of the public that does not identify or lean toward either party – a group that is far less likely to be registered to vote – just 44% say voting gives people some say in how government runs things, while 49% say it doesn’t really affect how government runs things.

Seven-in-ten of those with a post-graduate degree (70%) and 65% of those with a college degree say voting gives people some say in government; somewhat smaller shares of those with only some college experience (58%) or those with no more than a high school diploma (51%) say the same.

Unlike views on voting, there are no educational differences in the shares saying ordinary people can influence government if they make the effort.Scale of political efficacy

Blacks (58%) and Hispanics (57%) are more likely than whites (47%) to say that ordinary citizens can influence the government in Washington, if they’re willing to make the effort. There are no racial differences in views of the impact of voting.

These two measures of opinion on the impact of voting and on ordinary citizens’ ability to influence the government in Washington can be combined to create a scale of political efficacy. Those who rank “high” on the scale say both that voting gives people some say in how government runs things and that ordinary citizens can do a lot to influence the government in Washington, if they are willing to make the effort. “Medium” political efficacy includes those who hold only one of the two views, while “low” political efficacy describes those who do not hold either view.

Overall, 39% of the public falls into the high political efficacy category, while 33% have medium political efficacy and 28% have low political efficacy.

Political efficacy is higher among those with more education. For example, 47% of those with a post-graduate degree rank high on the scale of political efficacy, compared with 33% of those with no more than a high school diploma.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was one major impact of industrialization in the United States
    6·1 answer
  • When jared writes a paper on john f. kennedy's leadership style, he does not cite half the sources that he quoted and paraphrase
    8·2 answers
  • what makes the difference between being good and excellent in their evaluative criteria. It is during this stage of the process
    14·1 answer
  • The history of environmental science progresses the same as the progression of human _____ throughout the ages
    12·1 answer
  • Up through the early decades of the 20th century, many countries remained closed to trade, charging high tariffs or imposing str
    13·1 answer
  • Senioritis usually affects which of the following groups the most?
    7·2 answers
  • Ppolitics also must balance_________ with individual liberty because many possible and actual safety measures involve restrictio
    9·2 answers
  • According to Friedman’s opinion, who is responsible for the Great Depression
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the most important thing about King Clovis and Charles Martel?
    15·1 answer
  • Open the link and answer the questions please
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!