Answer: A. Skin colour
Explanation: When one determines social value on the basis of skin colour, then it is racism, because one values someone's general value and therefore the position in society on the basis of race. Race is determined by skin colour because, for example, two members of different races can speak the same language. Also size or dress does not determine race, size may be characteristic of particular ethnic groups within one race, but also within other races, so size does not predetermine race. There is intolerance between, say, two nations of the white race, it is not racism then, such a conflict can grow on religious, political and similar grounds but not racial. Racism is only about skin colour, so determining one's worth or attitude toward someone based on whether they are black, white, yellow or red.
From the wording of your question, especially the words "the following", I'm pretty sure you're looking at a list of choices that you're not sharing. There's no way that anyone can pick the right one if he can't see the list.
Answer:
Arjun Appadurai
Explanation:
Arjun Appadurai defined the process of globalization as "an infintely varied contest of sameness and difference in a complex disjunctive disorder" or shaped by a disorganized capitalism influenced by the social imaginary.
Arjun Appadurai is a Professor in New York University, He defined the process globalization as being shaped by social imaginary which is composed of five aspect of global cultural flow; ethnoscapes, technoscapes, ideoscapes, financescapes, and mediascapes.
The 24th Amendment prevents Congress from putting a poll tax or any other tax to prevents citizens from voting. It was passed to encourage more voting (mainly blacks),
