I think that Adam Smith would be more supportive of globalization of multinational corporations since his major work, the Wealth of Nations dealt with the workings of the capitalist system and supported it. I think that Karl Marx would be strongly opposed to the control that the multi-nationals have over their neo-colonies but at the same time would applaud the way that globalization has developed solidarity between the working class of the different countries such as between the major capitalist countries and the so-called Third World countries.
A nations power based on wealth is called is usually referred to as GDP, or "Gross Domestic Product" (if I'm understanding the question correctly. Although this isn't always a great indicator of the fundamental "health" of the country.<span />
I think the answer would be True. The domestication of animals allowed people to have a steady supply of milk, hides, and wool. Domesticated animals that provide milks are cows, sheep and cows. Same goes for the hides and wool.
Slavery was why the north and south were fighting, so it would be slavery
