The process of checks and balances which <em>make it more likely</em> that a judge, once appointed, will rule impartially is:
- It ensures that there is more than one person, more than one view so any ruling in the future would not be biased to that one view.
<h3>Checks and Balances</h3>
This is the principle that states that the three arms of government, the <em>Legislature, the Executive and the Judiciary</em> all have separated powers and <em>checks on the activities</em> of each other so that there would not be tyranny.
<h3>How this helps</h3>
This helps in the appointment of a federal judge as though the President, who is part of the Executive makes a list of federal judges to appoint, it is up to the Congress, part of the Legislature to either <em>accept or reject </em>this nomination and this ensures that the federal judge is <em>not loyal to the president </em>and neglects his duties,
Read more about checks and balances here:
brainly.com/question/8927972
Yes, becuase if it was taken during that time of period it is a primary source
