All categories

4 years ago

The price of a bracelet increased from $170 to $200 on Mother's Day.

2 answers:

6 0

The answer would be letter D, if you go ahead and divide 170 by .85 you will see that it gives you exactly 200. Why did I use 170, well because usally when you divide by a percentage or a number that has a point but with no initial number at the beggining of the point the number tends to rise, so I got the smallest number and started dividng it by my percentanges until I got my answer, if you divide 170 by .15 it gives you 1133.33 so it wont work, if you multiply it by .18 it gives you 944.44 so thats not it either, if you multiply it by .30 it will give you 566.67 os that is not either, but when you multiply it by .85 it gives you exactly 200

Hope this helps

Zolol [24]4 years ago

5 0

C because it's 170 + x = 200 so you solve for x basically

You might be interested in

Consider z = 3StartRoot 3 EndRoot + 3i. What happens to the modulus and argument when z is raised to the 4th power?

vfiekz [6]

Answer:

Its A on edge

The modulus increases by a factor of 216, and the argument increases by StartFraction pi Over 2 EndFraction.

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Try and answer these multiple questions again and I will try to give you brainiest. Good Luck!

IrinaK [193]

Answer: 9: c , 10: a ,11 :d 12: a

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Help please it’s needed

julia-pushkina [17]

Answer:

The reasonings I provided are just examples (they are true, though!). Hope this helps!

3 0

3 years ago

A data mining routine has been applied to a transaction dataset and has classified 88 records as fraudulent (30 correctly so) an

chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

The classification matrix is attached below

Part a

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is 65.91%.

Part b

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is 96.64%

Step-by-step explanation:

The classification matrix is obtained as shown below:

The transaction dataset has 30 fraudulent correctly classified records out of 88 records, that is, 30 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is negative.

Also, there would be 88 - 30 = 58 non-fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 58 records are incorrectly predicted given that an instance is positive.

The transaction dataset has 920 non-fraudulent correctly classified records out of 952 records, that is, 920 records are correctly predicted given that an instance is positive.

Also, there would be 952 - 920 = 32 fraudulent incorrectly classified records, that is, 32 records incorrectly predicted given that an instance is negative.

That is,

Predicted value

Active value Fraudulent Non-fraudulent

Fraudlent 30 58

non-fraudulent 32 920

The classification matrix is obtained by using the information related to the transaction data, which is classified into fraudulent records and non-fraudulent records.

The error rate is obtained as shown below:

The error rate is obtained by taking the ratio of $\left( {b + c} \right)(b+c)$ and the total number of records.

The classification matrix is, shown above

The total number of records is, $30 + 58 + 32 + 920 = 1,040$

The error rate is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\{\rm{Error}}\,{\rm{rate}} = \frac{{b + c}}{{{\rm{Total}}}}\\\\ = \frac{{58 + 32}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = \frac{{90}}{{1,040}}\\\\ = 0.0865\\\end{array}$

The percentage is $0.0865 \times 100 = 8.65$

(a)

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained by taking the rate ratio of b and $\left( {a + b} \right)(a+b)$ .

The classification error rate for the records those are truly fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown above and in the attachment

The error rate for truly fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\FP = \frac{b}{{a + b}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{30 + 58}}\\\\ = \frac{{58}}{{88}}\\\\ = 0.6591\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.6591 \times 100 = 65.91$

(b)

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained by taking the ratio of d and $\left( {c + d} \right)(c+d)$ .

The classification error rate for records that are truly non-fraudulent is obtained as shown below:

The classification matrix is, shown in the attachment

The error rate for truly non-fraudulent is,

$\begin{array}{c}\\TP = \frac{d}{{c + d}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{32 + 920}}\\\\ = \frac{{920}}{{952}}\\\\ = 0.9664\\\end{array}$

The percentage is, $0.9664 \times 100 = 96.64$

8 0

3 years ago

Can someone help me, please!!!

kolezko [41]

Answer:

The line shows an intercept of -3 and a slope of 5/7. Equation D displays this

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago