Answer:
We define the random variable X as the walking age and we are interested if American children learn to walk less than 15 months so then that would be the alternative hypothesis and the complement would be the null hypothesis.
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis: 
And for this case the best answer would be:
 H 0 : μ ≥ 15 vs. Ha : μ < 15
Step-by-step explanation:
We define the random variable X as the walking age and we are interested if American children learn to walk less than 15 months so then that would be the alternative hypothesis and the complement would be the null hypothesis.
Null hypothesis: 
Alternative hypothesis: 
And for this case the best answer would be:
 H 0 : μ ≥ 15 vs. Ha : μ < 15
And the data given from the sample is:
 represent the sample mean
 represent the sample mean
 represent the population deviation
 represent the population deviation
 represent the sample size
 represent the sample size
And the statistic would be given by:

 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
15 kg
Step-by-step explanation:
Radius of a solid sphere : mass of a solid sphere
3 cm : 9 kg
Find the mass of a sphere of the same material of radius 5 cm
Radius of a solid sphere : mass of a solid sphere
5 cm : x kg
Equate both ratios to find x
3 cm : 9 kg = 5 cm : x kg
3/9 = 5/x
3 * x = 9 * 5
3x = 45
x = 45/3
x = 15 kg
The mass of a sphere of the same material of radius 5 cm is 15 kg
 
        
             
        
        
        
C ) 131 is the answer
in the upside-vertex (not inverted) triangle, angle to your left hand side would be equal to x (as interior alternate angles) = 68
and the angle to the right would be 180-y= 180-117 = 163 (as linear angles)
so the angle at the vertex = 180 - (68 + 163) =49  (as angles in a triangle sum upto 180)
so the angle mz = 180 - 49 = 131 degrees (as linear pair of angles or angle in a straight line)
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
x²-12x+36
Step-by-step explanation:
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
You are correct, the profit is modeled by:
-0.1t² + 6t + 67
We are also told that "t" is the number of years after 2010. So in 2016, the value of t will be 6. We substitute this into the equation we formed:
-0.1(6²) + 6(6) + 67
= 106.6 thousand dollars