The name of the tactic is media advocacy.
As explained above, media advocacy is the strategic use of newsmaking through TV, radio and newspapers to promote public debate, and generate community support for changes in community norms and policies. Therefore, it is the <u>strategic use of mass media</u> to advance public policy initiatives. Members of the general public are the last decision makers and opinion leaders in our society. Community attitudes, beliefs, norms, and practices are shaped by the dialogues that occur within families and the social networks we experience in our everyday lives.
The president must be a natural-born citizen of the United States, be at least 35 years old, and have been a resident of the United States for 14 years.
I believe the answer is: Judge
Even though juries have the power to determine whether a defendant is guilty or not, they do not have a final decision in determining duration of prison stay.
That power (along with the power to maintain order during the trial) fall at the hands of the judges.
1.Research:Explore the websites provided to gather information on two landmark Supreme Court cases in order to compare the arguments for and against judicial restraint and judicial activism.
2.Write:Write an essay that compares and contrasts judicial activism and judicial restraint and presents your opinion on the debate surrounding these two philosophies.To get the best grade possible, follow the instructions in the assignment closely and answer all the questions completely. This assignment is worth 20 points.Use the provided websites to conduct research and answer the questions below. Your research will be critical to gathering the information necessary to write your essay. This section is worth 8 points.
1. Explain judicial restraint and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial restraint is where the judge limits the exercise of their own power and it comes into play when thejudge defers the issue to an elected official in the legislative or executive branches.
2. Explain judicial activism and the kinds of situations when it often comes into play. (1 point)Judicial activism is where the judge decides based on his/her opinion of what is best. These kinds of situations often occur when the judge tries to protect individual interests.
Info icon Subscribe to view the full document.
Subscribe to Unlock Right Arrow Icon
3. Explain the main arguments for and against judicial restraint. (1 point)For judicial restraintAgainst judicial restraintThe Constitution can only be interpreted by strict constructionist approachThe Constitution or laws made by legislature can be bague and be interpreted in different ways.
Could you explain this further?
