Answer:
A. a life course perspective to define normal aging and to distinguish it from pathological aging.
Explanation:
Continuity theory uses <em>a life course perspective to define normal aging and to distinguish it from pathological aging</em>. The continuity theory of aging states that when making choices older adults try to preserve existing patterns by applying the knowledge and strategies that they are familiar with. This theory states that when aging people tend to continue with their familiar lifestyle, changes and adaptations are consistent with this.
Answer:
An individual, forced to endure negative stimuli, becomes unable to avoid this stimulus.
Explanation:
Learned helplessness happens when a creature is over and overexposed to an aversive improvement that it cannot get away. Inevitably, the creature will quit attempting to maintain a strategic distance from the development and carry on as though it is defenseless to change the circumstance. In any event, when chances to escape are exhibited, this educated vulnerability will anticipate any activity.
At the point when individuals feel that they do not influence their circumstances, they may start to carry on in a powerless way. This inaction can lead individuals to disregard open doors for help or change.
The answer would be false , hope this helps
Answer:
promote peace through international agreements.
Explanation:
The United Nations is an international organisation created with the purpose to maintain peace internationally. The organisation was set up in 1945 after World War II.
The organisation started with 51 countries as its members now reaching the membership of 193 members. The headquarters of he organization is in New York City.
<u>The primary purpose of the formation of this organisation was to promote peace by forming certain international agreements. It required that all nations should come together peacefully and resolve the world issues peacefully.</u>
So, the correct answer is maintaining international peace.
Answer:
Explanation:
It wasn't exactly disagreeable speech. The Supreme Court wrangled about the place of the American Flag in American life.
The core issue was whether or not desecration of the US flag is protected by the First Amendment. The Supreme Court's final decision was yes but only by a 5-4 margin.
So in effect disagreeable speech was upheld. Various attempts have been made to make burning of the flag just going a bit too far. All attempts have failed and the right to disagreeable speech has been upheld.
