-21 I'm pretty sure, love your name!
The easiest way to find answers for questions like these is to convert them to improper fractions, solve, and then convert them back to mixed numbers (if the question required it). When we convert these to improper fractions, we have 7/4 and 19/8. We can then find the least common denominator of the 2 so that we can solve. The least common denominator is 8, and since we are multiplying the 4 by 2 to get it there, we must also multiply the 7 by 2. Now we have 19/8-14/8. At this point, we can use simple subtraction to subtract the numerators and get 5/8.
To summarize, Cameron used 5/8 more acid in the second experiment.
Answer:
You plot the points on the coordinates of [3, 0], [-1, 0], [-3, 0].
Step-by-step explanation:
You set the whole thing equal to zero, and when evaluated correctly, you come up with the above answer.
I am joyous to assist you anytime.
The true statement is that: if you cannot get from one term to the next by adding or multiplying by a constant value, the sequence is neither arithmetic nor geometric
<h3>How to determine the true statement</h3>
A progression can either be arithmetic, geometric or neither.
- When the progression has a common difference (gotten by addition), then the progression is arithmetic
- When the progression has a common ratio (gotten by multiplication), then the progression is geometric
If the above are not true, then the sequence is neither arithmetic nor geometric
Read more about sequence at:
brainly.com/question/6561461
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
First, subtract 4 from both sides. When you do this, that leaves you with: 3x=9. Then, divide 9 by 3 to get x by itself. x=3
