1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
rosijanka [135]
3 years ago
12

What's an example of how an executive department enforces a governmental policy? Be as specific as possible.​

Social Studies
1 answer:
Leto [7]3 years ago
8 0
An example of how an executive department enforces a governmental policy is by vetoing a law.
You might be interested in
HELLLLLLLP PLEaSEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

i think it's a.

Explanation:

[character limit pass]

7 0
3 years ago
Which is an example of a social context that may affect a person's behavior?
Leona [35]

Answer:

The correct answer is c) living in a rural area.

Explanation:

When talking about a social context, reference is made to the environment where a person lives and is where the individual develops his interaction with society, where he learns customs and behavior.

The social context will tell us a lot about how the person will develop since human behavior is closely related to the social context.

Social context will influence <em>the actions </em>that the person performs. For example, in this case, the people who live in a rural have different customs than the people who live in an urban area; many times, this simple detail causes people to have different aspirations and develop differently.

<em>I hope this information can help you.</em>

4 0
4 years ago
Which processes happen in the kidney? Check all that apply.
Tanya [424]

Answer:

production of urine

filtration of waste material from blood

reabsorption of sugar and water

Explanation:

took the test

8 0
3 years ago
Please write an essay discussing whether and how a) the act of voting is the personal responsibility of every citizen, and b) ci
Delvig [45]

Voting: A Right, A Privilege, or A Responsibility?

When Americans talk about their democracy, they typically emphasize the importance of the right to vote. But the fact is that, unlike other democratic rights protected in the First Amendment, voting rights do not have clear constitutional protections. State legislatures have the right to appoint electors in presidential races without holding elections, for example, and states can enact a variety of policies that directly or indirectly infringe on suffrage rights. While strengthening voting rights in the Constitution would seem like a logical step, there's a potential political barrier: confusion about the meaning of "right."  

This essay invites readers to question whether the ability to vote should be a right, a privilege, or a responsibility. For the ease of readership, I will define the necessary terms:  

  • Privilege (n): An immunity or benefit enjoyed only by a person beyond the advantaged of most.
  • Right (n): That which is due to anyone by just claim, legal guarantees, or moral principles.
  • Responsibility (n): Being answerable or accountable for something within one's power, control, or management.

At first glance, it's easy to view these terms as mutually exclusive. From their definitions, we can see that what is a "privilege" cannot be a right since rights are enjoyed by everyone, while a privilege is reserved for a select group. Likewise, it's impossible for an individual to take on the burden of responsibility if they lack to the right to vote in the first place.

Despite this initial judgment, many people view the ability to vote as all three simultaneously and weigh "right" after "privilege" or "responsibility." For example, many believe the ability to vote is a privilege granted to today's eligible voters by those who fought for it in the past either through war, grassroots movements, or legislative battles. These struggles have kept the United States as an independent nation and granted us the right to vote with the passage of the 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th amendment, in addition to the legislative victory of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. From this perspective, it is a privilege to live in the United States, standing on the shoulders of these past giants, and we have a responsibility to vote because it honors those who have put their lives on the line to protect it.

Indeed a study conducted in 2006 by Peter D. Hart Research Associates found far most participants in a series of focus groups saw voting as a responsibility or a privilege more than as a right. Many categorized voting primarily as a privilege because previous generations had fought for it and other countries don't enjoy the same freedom. The plurality of participants saw it primarily as a responsibility because it highlights the importance of choosing the government. Many of these participants chose not to classify it primarily as a "right" because the word "right" suggested to them a sense of entitlement.

Many participants also believed that fraud was a bigger problem than disenfranchisement. Although these beliefs are not based in reality (proven cases of voter fraud are miniscule compared to clear cases of denial of suffrage), they say something very important about the general mindset of American voters. When it comes to voting, "right" is a dangerous word since it suggests the ability to vote has simply been given to you without a fight -- and things that can make voting harder but prevent fraud like voter registration laws, requirements for photo identification and inconvenient polling places are minor compared to the sacrifices of past generations. In this mindset, anyone who might not vote due to such barriers is not accepting responsibility for how important it is and not recognizing what a privilege it is to have the right to vote.

As is obvious from the Peter Hart study, a common misconception is the word "right" denoting a sense of entitlement. People who hold this view shy away from considering the ability to vote a right because it suggests it has simply been given to us without historical struggles, thereby demeaning the individuals who have laid their lives on the line to forge and preserve our freedoms.

7 0
3 years ago
A researcher wants to observe preschoolers at a local public playground to evaluate levels of cooperation. the researcher will n
lesantik [10]

The answer is "this research would not require IRB review because it would be eligible for exemption since the researcher is not interacting with the children and the playground is a public setting".

IBR is a kind of board that applies research morals by looking into the techniques proposed for research to guarantee that they are moral and ethical and do not cross any limits proposed.


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the only crime mentioned in the Constitution?
    13·2 answers
  • Just outside the third circle of members, and blending into it, is the _____ public.
    10·2 answers
  • In an experiment what is the name of the group that does not receive the experimental treatment?
    11·1 answer
  • Your family uses steel wool soap pads and pans. Often they get rusty after use. What could you do to stop the pads from rusting?
    9·1 answer
  • Can you use mental health as a reason for gaps in employment? answers
    7·1 answer
  • which one of the following actions should become an important part of your study schedule? a. finding out what works for others
    15·1 answer
  • Most western democracies have rights such as the freedom of speech and freedom of religion. True or False
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP! I WILL MARK BRAINLEST!!!
    9·2 answers
  • Women were asked to work in factories during World War I because
    11·2 answers
  • A popular notion is that people only use about 10 percent of their brains and that the remaining 90 percent has untapped potenti
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!