The correct answer is D. the girl is likely to see Miguel as just as approachable as riders who are not using iPods.
Explanation: When she saw someone in iPods she thinks that this person is not easy to talk
Answer:
Bearing in mind that it was Davidson that recommended the rope while stating the specific of the rope. The specifics of the rope would be considered facts, it is this facts that the court would find to be bounded to the warranty. On his part, Moon only stated the fact that he needs rope for his farm, but does not specify what he needs it for. The recommendation by Davidson for that specific rope is based only on the details that it would be used for the farm. This is pointing that, Moon is relying entirely on the seller, who knows about the product, to recommend him a type of rope.
However, there is need to put into consideration that Moon does not specify the exact use of the rope. This implies that Davidson states the he recommends the use of that specific rope.
With the argument back and forth between seller and buyer, there is no warranty at the instance that the seller breached an implied warranty of merchantability, but one can argue there was a
breach of implied warranty of particular purpose if it is taken into consideration that the use of that particular rope is not usually used in farms.
Explanation:
See answer
D.
For example in New York, the Erie Canal was dug to connect Lake Erie in western NY to Hudson River in eastern side of NY.
Waterway built to allow ship travel vs. slower overland wagons etc.
The correct answer is C.
The hiking boots and the sleeping bag are two products that she bought and which are necessary for the hiking trip. On the other hand, the want is the pair of jeans, which is a product that she desired and bought, but that is not necessary or useful for the coming trip.
