1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lubasha [3.4K]
3 years ago
12

Do you agree or disagree with the Court's decision that a president must reveal material that he has recorded for his own use if

it is needed as evidence in a criminal trial? Explain.
Law
1 answer:
Black_prince [1.1K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

before the law everyone is equal and if this law requires evidence of a crime then he must assist with his testimony and the materials that may be relevant to the crime committed

You might be interested in
To work for the Federal Bureau of Prisons, a candidate generally cannot be older than _____.
chubhunter [2.5K]

Answer:

37

Explanation:

At time of appointment, applicants must not have reached their 37th birthday unless they previously served in a Federal civilian law enforcement position covered by special civil service retirement provisions, including early or mandatory retirement.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Answer the following questions that have to do with the "Brown V. Board of Education".
icang [17]

Answer:

I agree with the decision of the case because in the declaration of independence paragraph two it states, "All men are created equal." it would be unconstitutional for schools to be separated based on the color of there skin. I wouldnt have done anything differently if I were a judge of the supreme court because I would know that it violates the the 14 Amendment.

6 0
3 years ago
What is 8% put into a fraction and decimal
Mumz [18]
Fraction 2/25 decimal is 0.08
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
which amendment outlawed the manufacture, sale, transportation, import, or export of alcoholic beverages?
Nina [5.8K]

Answer:

the 18th Amendment

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Which two arguments support loose constructionism?
Anastaziya [24]

Answer:

Loose constructionism is an ideological position of legal interpretation (especially of the Constitution) by means of which the judges have the power not only to judge compliance with the different laws, but also to interpret the text of the legal provisions of the Constitution, defining its scope and content.

Two arguments in favor of this position are, on the one hand, that the Constitution is not a rigid law but that it is constantly being modified through jurisprudential interpretations, with which it is necessary for judges to be able to interpret its clauses in a lax way; and on the other, that a rigid Constitution would be easily set aside by society, since it would not adapt to changes in circumstances on its part.

7 1
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What case set 18 as the minimum age for the application of the death penalty
    5·1 answer
  • Identify and explain the eight general forecasts that experts believe are likely to occur in the area of computer crime.
    15·1 answer
  • The burden of proof in a civil case is:
    7·2 answers
  • 1 - Multiple choice
    11·1 answer
  • A man was accused of attacking another man. He was brought into police custody and interrogated for 2 hours. Prior to the interr
    12·2 answers
  • You make it to a crime scene and notice that there is a trail of footprints going through the
    8·1 answer
  • which among the six Philippines constitution is the best in term of the protecting our country and the right of the Filipino cit
    13·1 answer
  • The legal ability to enter into a binding agreement is known as ________.
    14·2 answers
  • What is the supreme court law of the united states.
    12·2 answers
  • Question 4<br> A Identify at least three maior costs of owning a vehicle throughout a year.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!