1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergejj [24]
3 years ago
11

TWhat 1967 supreme court ruling held that juveniles accused of delinquent acts have many of the same rights afforded to adults u

nder the 6th and 14th amendments?
Law
1 answer:
m_a_m_a [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In re Gault 387 U.S. 1 (1967)

Explanation:

In this, was the case of Gerald Gault, a fifteen year old boy, who was accused by his neighbor, Mrs Cook, to have made inappropriate phone calls to her in June 1964.  

When the woman filed the a compliant at the court, young Gault and his friend, Ronald, were arrested and remanded at the detention home for children in Arizona. When Mrs Gault, the mother of Gerald came to the detention home to see her son, she was informed of the issue for the first time and was also told of the hearing that would be coming up.  

The probation officers agreed and filed a case that listed the charge as lewd phone call. The judge committed Gault to juvenile detention until he gets to the age of 21. Writ of habeas corpus was filed by the parents of Gerald but the courts in Arizona dismissed it. Supreme court ruling held that juveniles accused of delinquent acts have many of the same rights afforded to adults under the 6th and 14th amendments .

You might be interested in
10 points
masya89 [10]
Im pretty sure it would be true. If im wrong im sorry
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The typical first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation is called:A. RemediationB. The adjudicationC. The a
Alona [7]

Answer:

D= The Inquiry

Explanation:

The inquiry which is literally the process of asking for information is generally the first main phase in response to a research misconduct allegation.

8 0
3 years ago
1. What areas do you feel States should govern(make laws for)? Why those areas?
777dan777 [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

put it put it put it pu it in LOVE

8 0
3 years ago
Một hành vi có thể đồng thời là vi phạm pháp luật hình sự vừa là vi phạm pháp luật hành chính, nhưng không thể đồng thời vừa là
Naily [24]

Câu trả lời là có. Nhiều phiên tòa có thể vừa dân sự vừa hình sự. Ví dụ, một người cố ý giết người khác có thể bị buộc tội giết người tại tòa án hình sự và cũng có thể bị kiện dân sự về tội chết oan.

8 0
3 years ago
Explain the steps in the arrest and prosecution of someone who is accused of a felony. Your response should be at least 150 word
choli [55]

Answer:

take what you need

Explanation:

Arrest

Criminal prosecution typically begins with an arrest by a police officer. A police officer may arrest a person if (1) the officer observes the person committing a crime; (2) the officer has probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed by that person; or (3) the officer makes the arrest under the authority of a valid arrest warrant. After the arrest, the police books the suspect. When the police complete the booking process, they place the suspect in custody. If the suspect commited a minor offense, the policy may issue a citation to the suspect with instructions to appear in court at a later date.

Bail

If a suspect in police custody is granted bail, the suspect may pay the bail amount in exchange for a release. Release on bail is contingent on the suspect's promise to appear at all scheduled court proceedings. Bail may be granted to a suspect immediately after booking or at a later bail review hearing. Alternatively, a suspect may be released on his "own recognizance." A suspect released on his own recognizance need not post bail, but must promise in writing to appear at all scheduled court appearances. Own recognizance release is granted after the court considers the seriousness of the offense, and the suspect's criminal record, threat to the community and ties to family and employment.

Arraignment

The suspect makes his first court appearance at the arraignment. During arraignment, the judge reads the charges filed against the defendant in the complaint and the defendant chooses to plead "guilty," "not guilty" or "no contest" to those charges. The judge will also review the defendant's bail and set dates for future proceedings.

Preliminary Hearing or Grand Jury Proceedings

The government generally brings criminal charges in one of two ways: by a "bill of information" secured by a preliminary hearing or by grand jury indictment. In the federal system, cases must be brought by indictment. States, however, are free to use either process. Both preliminary hearings and grand juries are used to establish the existence of probable cause. If there is no finding of probable cause, a defendant will not be forced to stand trial.

A preliminary hearing, or preliminary examination, is an adversarial proceeding in which counsel questions witnesses and both parties makes arguments. The judge then makes the ultimate finding of probable cause. The grand jury, on the other hand, hears only from the prosecutor. The grand jury may call their own witnesses and request that further investigations be performed. The grand jury then decides whether sufficient evidence has been presented to indict the defendant.

Pre-Trial Motions

Pre-trial motions are brought by both the prosecution and the defense in order to resolve final issues and establish what evidence and testimony will be admissible at trial.

Trial

At trial, the judge or the jury will either find the defendant guilty or not guilty. The prosecution bears the burden of proof in a criminal trial. Thus, the prosecutor must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crimes charged. The defendant has a constitutional right to a jury trial in most criminal matters. A jury or judge makes the final determination of guilt or innocence after listening to opening and closing statements, examination and cross-examination of witnesses and jury instructions. If the jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, the judge may declare a mistrial, and the case will either be dismissed or a new jury will be chosen. If a judge or jury finds the defendant guilty, the court will sentence the defendant.

Sentencing

During the sentencing phase of a criminal case, the court determines the appropriate punishment for the convicted defendant. In determining a suitable sentence, the court will consider a number of factors, including the nature and severity of the crime, the defendant's criminal history, the defendant's personal circumstances and the degree of remorse felt by the defendant.

Appeal

An individual convicted of a crime may ask that his or her case be reviewed by a higher court. If that court finds an error in the case or the sentence imposed, the court may reverse the conviction or find that the case should be re-tried.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does Ivan Jakovlevitch find in his breakfast bread?
    7·2 answers
  • QUESTION 9
    13·1 answer
  • When a criminal comes in contact with an object or person, a cross transfer of evidence occurs
    5·2 answers
  • The ________________ attends a 6 hour training class prior to each election and is responsible for overall management of the pol
    11·2 answers
  • What kind of information would best help you answer the prompt? Check all that apply.
    11·2 answers
  • If your car has airbags, you don't have to wear a seat belt.<br> A. True<br> B. False
    11·1 answer
  • True or False: If you wanted to get a divorce, you would go to a criminal court
    5·2 answers
  • Should the insanity defense be kept as is, changed in some way or abolished?
    11·2 answers
  • Idioms and their meanings
    8·1 answer
  • Research a criminal case that was resolved through plea bargaining, and explain the facts of the case. Weighing the evidence and
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!