Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The hypothesis is written as follows
For the null hypothesis,
µd ≤ 10
For the alternative hypothesis,
µ > 10
This is a right tailed test
Since no population standard deviation is given, the distribution is a student's t.
Since n = 97
Degrees of freedom, df = n - 1 = 97 - 1 = 96
t = (x - µ)/(s/√n)
Where
x = sample mean = 8.9
µ = population mean = 10
s = samples standard deviation = 3.6
t = (8.9 - 10)/(3.6/√97) = - 3
We would determine the p value using the t test calculator. It becomes
p = 0.00172
Since alpha, 0.01 > than the p value, 0.00172, then we would reject the null hypothesis. Therefore, At a 1% level of significance, there is enough evidence that the data do not support the vendor’s claim.
Answer:
120:80 I think this is the answer
Step-by-step explanation:




Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
a) Denote the event of commercially availability of f_uel cell technology as F_, commercial availability of solar power technology as S
Write the probability of energy supplied by these energy sources in the next 10 years
P(energy supplied) = P(S ∪ F) -----(1)
Rewrite eqn (1)
P(energy supplied) = P(S) + P(F) - P(F) P(S) ----(2)
substitute 0.85 for P(S) and 0,7 for P(F) in eqn (2) to find the probability of energy supplied by these energy sources
P(energy supplied) = 0.85 + 0.7 - (0.7 * 0.85)
= 0.85 + 0.7 - (0.595)
= 1.55 - 0.595
= 0.955
Therefore, the probability that there will be energy supplied by these two alternative sources in the next 10 years is 0.955
B) write the probability of only one source of energy available
P(only one source of energy available) =
∪
---(3)
Rewrite the equation (3)
P(only one source of energy available) =
![=P(\bar F S)+P(\bar S F)\\\\=\{[1-P(F)]P(S)+[1-P(S)]P(F)\}---(4)](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3DP%28%5Cbar%20F%20S%29%2BP%28%5Cbar%20S%20F%29%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D%5C%7B%5B1-P%28F%29%5DP%28S%29%2B%5B1-P%28S%29%5DP%28F%29%5C%7D---%284%29)
![=\{[1-0.7]0.85+[1-0.85]0.7\}\\\\=0.255+0.105\\\\=0.36](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%3D%5C%7B%5B1-0.7%5D0.85%2B%5B1-0.85%5D0.7%5C%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D0.255%2B0.105%5C%5C%5C%5C%3D0.36)
Therefore,The probability that only one of the two alternative energy sources will be commercially viable in the next 10 years is 0.36
I like to think of the - or under as the less likely to happen like a cat beating up a bear u don’t want to put your money on the cat so everyone puts there money on the bear making the bear the over and the cat the under
Answer:
she will be taking 3600 mgs. in 90 days
Step-by-step explanation:
if she is taking a 20 mgs. twice a day that will make it 40 mgs. a day. If she takes it for 90 days
you will multiply 90 by 40
so
90
x40
= 3600 mgs. in 90 days