As far as I know, only the 3rd step, from all the mentioned above occur during meiosis I.
Hope it helped,
Happy homework/ study/ exam!
Answer:
A plant based diet is clearly more nutritious. In fact, all protein orginates in plants. This is because it does not contain cholestrol, has very little amounts of fat, and is the only source of fiber. The science also bears this out. A plant based diet requires less recourses because it does not require the feeing of animals. The grain, fruit, vegtables, etc. goes directly to huaman, rather than being given to a imprisoned animals first. People should not only eat less meat, the should eat no meat. This is due to the three pillars of veganism. Ethics, envirnonment, and health. It is unethical to keep a animal in a cage it's short life and murder it. It is not envronmentally safe to raise trillions of animals a year all of whom produce methane, which is 16x more potent than CO2. And for health. It is increadable unhealthy to eat animal products. T. Colin Campbell has found a connection between cancer and dairy. Dr. Caldwell Esselstyn has found a undeinable link to heart disease. There are may more connections like this, which are very clear in their message: Humans can not handle the saturated fat, HEME iron, cholestrol, sugars, inflammatory substances, and everything else that comes with eating animals. Humans basic biology says we should not eat meat. We cannot murder animals with the tools that nature gave us.
Explanation:
D. Pollination would be your answer.
The bee carries the pollen from the male to a female flower
Explanation:
Is The Hill (thehill.com) a trusted news website or does it have a strong bias?
From what I’ve seen, The Hill’s news reporting is pretty even handed and accurate, although the site is considered to be slightly right leaning.
However, they also employ John Solomon as their executive VP of digital video and as a columnist. With a strong background in investigative journalism, his work of late has descended into promoting baseless conspiracy theories, like the widely discredited Uranium One. I’ve seen stories of his promoted by the right-wing media in the past couple of years that have fallen apart under scrutiny.
UPDATE (5–23–2020): Someone a couple of revisions that I rejected. Nothing about spelling or grammar. This answer was accurate when it was written, although The Hill has since parted with Solomon. Brendan Delaney’s second edit suggestion was not only inaccurate, but would have made the answer his own. Better that he simply answer the question himself or make his points in a comment. But then again if you do think about it Well…John Solomon was their chief editor for a long time and he’s a hard-right, loony conspiracy theorist nutbar. The site is also owned by Jerry Finkelstein, who is good friends with Trump. Furthermore, The Hill does gives face time to a lot of hard-right opinion pieces.
On the flipside, they ARE a good aggregator of political news and publish stories you won’t find elsewhere, which balances things out somewhat.
Solomon left a few months ago Fox News and The Hill seems to be making an honest effort to balance their editorial more. Jury is still out on whether they’ll be successful or not.
