9514 1404 393
Answer:
28 square units
Step-by-step explanation:
The rectangle is 7-0 = 7 units high and 6-2 = 4 units wide. Its area is the product of these dimensions:
A = LW
A = (7)(4) = 28 . . . square units
Yuki´s guppies have begun to have babies . She started with 5 guppies. One week later,yuki counted twice as many guppies in the
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Check the picture below.
a)
so the perimeter will include "part" of the circumference of the green circle, and it will include "part" of the red encircled section, plus the endpoints where the pathway ends.
the endpoints, are just 2 meters long, as you can see 2+15+2 is 19, or the radius of the "outer radius".
let's find the circumference of the green circle, and then subtract the arc of that sector that's not part of the perimeter.
and then let's get the circumference of the red encircled section, and also subtract the arc of that sector, and then we add the endpoints and that's the perimeter.
b)
we do about the same here as well, we get the full area of the red encircled area, and then subtract the sector with 135°, and then subtract the sector of the green circle that is 360° - 135°, or 225°, the part that wasn't included in the previous subtraction.
a)
so the perimeter will include "part" of the circumference of the green circle, and it will include "part" of the red encircled section, plus the endpoints where the pathway ends.
the endpoints, are just 2 meters long, as you can see 2+15+2 is 19, or the radius of the "outer radius".
let's find the circumference of the green circle, and then subtract the arc of that sector that's not part of the perimeter.
and then let's get the circumference of the red encircled section, and also subtract the arc of that sector, and then we add the endpoints and that's the perimeter.
b)
we do about the same here as well, we get the full area of the red encircled area, and then subtract the sector with 135°, and then subtract the sector of the green circle that is 360° - 135°, or 225°, the part that wasn't included in the previous subtraction.
Answer:
Jessie scored higher than Reagan.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given that Reagan scored 1140 on the SAT. The distribution of SAT scores in a reference population is normally distributed with mean 1000 and standard deviation 100.
Jessie scored 30 on the ACT. The distribution of ACT scores in a reference population is normally distributed with mean 17 and standard deviation 5.
For finding who performed better on the standardized exams, we have to calculate the z-scores for both people.
1. <u>Finding z-score for Reagan;</u>
Let X = distribution of SAT scores
SO, X ~ Normal()
The z-score probability distribution for the normal distribution is given by;
Z = ~ N(0,1)
where, = population mean = 1000
= standard deviation = 100
Now, Reagan scored 1140 on the SAT, that is;
z-score = = 1.4
2. <u>Finding z-score for Jessie;</u>
Let X = distribution of ACT scores
SO, X ~ Normal()
The z-score probability distribution for the normal distribution is given by;
Z = ~ N(0,1)
where, = population mean = 17
= standard deviation = 5
Now, Jessie scored 30 on the ACT, that is;
z-score = = 2.6
This means that Jessie scored higher than Reagan because Jessie's standardized score was 2.6, which is 2.6 standard deviations above the mean and Reagan's standardized score was 1.4, which is 1.4 standard deviations above the mean.
<h2><u>ANSWER</u></h2>
y = 8
x= -1
Step-by-step explanation:
hope it helps ✌️✌️