Answer:
The correct answer is B. result from the political bias toward immediate benefits and deferred costs.
Explanation:
While many people run hysterically on the streets begging politicians to act in the face of the threat of climate change, many people, young and old, may be demanding the same type of action, but to fix the unfunded passive systems.
By extending eligibility and increasing the benefits of a pay-per-use system while at the same time having fewer children to finance it, previous generations have left a fearsome financial obligation. Either taxes will increase dramatically for tomorrow's workers, lowering their standard of living, or benefits will fall for tomorrow's retirees, lowering their standard of living. A group will feel very angry.
These problems were anticipated even when politicians were raising payments, but each elected government simply kicked the can and allowed things to continue as usual.
Social security systems and pension funds are actuarially not funded systems. There is no obligation for this generation to have children at the same rate as previous generations. Therefore, when those born in the 1950s reach retirement age in the next century, their stipends will feel more like a burden due to the ranks of non-active members of society that will depend on their contributions to live.
Answer:
The asset turnover is 1.44 and return on assets is 0.37%
Explanation:
Average Total assets
Assets in the beginning $24,590
Assets at the end $23,300
Average assets $23945
Sales $34,450
Divide: Average assets $23945
Assets turnover ratio 1.44
Net Income $89
Divide: Average assets $23945
Return on assets 0.37%
Therefore, The asset turnover is 1.44 and return on assets is 0.37%
A company that exists on different locations around the world I think.
I would think money,supply or demand?
It means it has become sugar
