D: the sharp and powerful talons of the bird
He just means that difficulties present opportunities.
FOR EXAMPLE:the difficulty of an unsolved math or science problem,for instance, provide the opportunity to solve the problem.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE:the difficulty of facing another runner provide you an opportunity to break record.
I HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND
<span>1. In my opinion this situation is an example of wasting talent. Yes, Hanna has natural skill at field hockey, but she does not develop it. The lack of practice could cause the wasting of your natural skill. Natural skill = talent, so the answer is "wasting talent".
2. I think that this one is also an example of wasting talent. Even if Marcy is a very good math student, she should prove it by showing good results on tests. And the most important thing that she should expand her math knowledge and not to lose her potential. It also could be a result of getting distracted but there was no mention about this factor.
3. In my view this situation is a good example of allowing others to set goals. This commercial allowed Stefan to set goal to buy this reader. Now he has a goal that he can reach or not.
4. I am definitely sure that this situation is an example of allowing others to set goals. This situation gives him an additional motivation to rich his goal by proving his parents that being a teacher is his calling.
5. This situation is also a good example of allowing others to set goals. Father asks Noah to stay closer to hove, and gives him an opportunity to choose between family or career. According to what he chooses, he can set a particular set of goals.
6. This situation is 100% an example of getting distracted. Elise is wrong at her time management because she is being distracted by her friends. We don't know if she is good at English and has some natural skills, so it's "getting distracted" option.
7. If I understand it correctly, this situation is an example of allowing others to set goals. Because Jim has a choice between internship or working at the grocery to help himself and his father to get money for college. He should to think how to set his goals correctly.
8. I am completely sure that this one is an example of wasting talent. Ben sets his priorities wrong and he wastes his potential in wrestling because if he doesn't lose two pounds, he won't wreslte this week. It's important to keep in shape when you are doing sports.
9. If I got it right, this situation is an example of getting distracted. Ellen has lost her attention because of the loud music while she was driving her car with friends.
10. I am pretty sure that in this case it would be "wasting talent" option. Jose does not develop his natural skill to be a leader by practicing in real life. He wastes his potential and his talent without enough practice.</span>
Answer:
The biggest difference between round and flat characters is the character's complexity: round characters have layers, while flat characters do not. These layers cause the round characters to be more interesting, meaning audiences can more easily sympathize with round characters than with flat ones
Explanation:
Round is also called complex character. They call it round because it has more personality and traits than the limited or flat character.
If you are fluent in two languages, and have ever spoken to someone else who is also fluent in the same two languages, then you can likely talk about a personal experience in which you both used elements from these two languages within your conversation. For example, I speak both Spanish and English, and often talk to my friend who also speaks Spanish and English. We will primarily talk in English, but will switch to Spanish for certain words or phrases that are better expressed in Spanish, like when using the verb "to know" (there are two verbs for "to know" in Spanish--conocer and saber--which have different meanings and are more descriptive than the English verb "to know").
In regard to the second question, you could argue that code-switching represents a bridge to communication, because it's patching together different languages to send an even clearer message to someone else. Since both speakers would have to be fluent in the same languages in order to code-switch (by definition), then there should be an equal understanding between the two.
