Answer:
forbearance
Explanation:
A customer ordered fried chicken strips at the drive-in window of Famous Burger. One of the "strips" turned out to be an entire chicken head, battered and deep fried. Famous Burger tested the head and found that it was, indeed, cooked in their batter and in their oil. Pictures of the customer with the fried head showed up in newspapers and on the Internet. Famous Burger offered the customer a cash settlement in exchange for promises to not divulge the amount of the settlement, sue Famous Burger over the incident, or ever speak of it in public again. Agreeing NOT to exercise these three rights in exchange for the settlement is an example of <u>forbearance</u>.
Forbearance in law refers to the act of refraining to seek legal actions, to sue or enforce a right. This is usually accepted after out of court settlement between the parties involved.
Answer:
D) none of it
Explanation:
Buz cannot recovery any money because he is guilty of two crimes:
- Bribery - because he was giving money to a public official (a police officer) in exchange of favours.
- Illegal gambling - he was running a gambling business in a jurisdiction where gambling is not allowed.
Buz will probably have to pay a heftly sum of money, or go to jail, or both.
The false statement is The "Beltway mentality" is a desired goal of every presidential administration.
<h3>What is Beltway Mentality?</h3>
Beltway Mentality refers to the the American idiom which means to fulfill the needs and the desire of the specific group rather than considering the general population.
The complete question is attached below.
Thus the statement beltway mentality isn't the goal of the presidential administration. The president thinks about the population rather than the any corporate media or any other group. Thus the statement is false.
Learn more about presidential administration here:
brainly.com/question/2494251
#SPJ1
Social media can at times Weaken our inhibitions or internal censors, emboldening us to write things or post images.
Our contacts with others on social media frequently result in "weak bonds," meaning that we don't feel as personally connected to them as we do when we speak to them in person. Consequently, even while we communicate more, we may not necessarily be strengthening our relationships as much.
When we connect via social media, we frequently trust the individuals receiving our messages, which results in generally more honest conversation. Second, we tend not to deepen our relationships—they tend to remain in the status quo—because social media does not strengthen our social ties as much as face-to-face interaction does. Finally, we don't receive the same variety of ideas as we once did because we frequently contact and follow people who share our opinions.
Learn more about censors https://brainly.in/question/6357532
#SPJ4
