The option that describes a deconstructionist approach to a text is - complicates the meaning of the text. Deconstructionists like to dig deep into the text, and find meanings that aren’t obvious at the first, second, or even the third glance. They like to analyze texts so much that they bear everything within their interpretation, and get to the very core of the text, thus complicating something that would otherwise have been a simple analysis.
Answer:
this led too & consequently
Explanation:
its showing a correlation to what happened when X occured
U missed the “it” in the middle of because and was
Fallacy is the use of faulty arguments which are not valid and as such are <em>rendered untrue </em>because of the way they are presented in the argument. <em>Some fallacies look valid,</em> but are still fallacious because <em>they do not satisfy</em> an important logical premise.
As a result of this, we can see that there are various types of fallacy and they include:
- Fallacy of Hasty Generalisation
- Argumentum ad Baculum
- Argumentum ad Hominem
- Slippery Slope
For example, when we use Argumentum ad Baculum (appeal to force), we try to make use of force to silence a person who has made a very valid and logical argument.
For example, when you tell a person, "I will soon slap you if you do not close up your mouth" is an appeal to force or Argumentum ad Baculum
Please note that your question is incomplete so I gave you a general overview so that you would get a better understanding of the concept.
Read more about fallacy here:
brainly.com/question/20939336
Answer:
I'm not completely sure but I would say: C.) Unlike Michelangelo, few painters had the talent to also sculpt statues.
It is the "also" that makes it sound off.