Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled that the name Coke was so well known around the world, that it is effectively a common term for the trademarked Coca Cola. If other companies try to use similar terms like Koke for other types of products, e.g. bakery items, there is a risk that the Coca Cola company would be negatively affected by that product's image since consumers might associate Koke directly to Coca Cola.
It doesn't matter if the products were low quality or not, the courts cannot determine that, what matters is that the use of the term may negatively impact another company.
It would not fall at all. Monopolists own the entire industry meaning the consumers have no alternatives. If they have no alternative they have no choice but to buy even if the price increases
Labor contract.
A labor contract sets for the rights and responsibilities of labor and management for unions and other labor groups.
Answer:
a. less wealthy and they buy less.
Explanation:
we are assuming a situation where the price level rises (inflation rises), so anyone holding cash will be able to purchase a smaller amount of goods with the same amount of cash simply because the goods are more expensive. E.g. you purchased 10 goods with $100, but if the inflation rate increases to 10%, you will be able to purchase only 9 goods with the same $100. As inflation rises, people holding cash (or other monetary form) will lose wealth and purchasing power.
