All categories

3 years ago

Provide an economic argument for why the U.S. is home to 25% of global prisoners.

Business

1 answer:

Rainbow [258]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

1. High rate of tax payment

2. Stricter Government Policies

3. High rates in crimes, kidnappings and killings

Explanation:

It is evident from statistics that the rate of incarceration in the United States is more than half of most countries in the World. It means that out 716 people out of 100000 people in the world are incarcerated in the United states.This is true due to the following reasons

1. The Economic situation in the states is a bit stricter than anywhere in the world. High taxes on Sole business owners, about 42%. Defaulters are made to face the wrought of the law.

The U.S. criminal justice system has been politicized and more responsive to popular opinion, experts said. The United States also functions as 51 separate countries, because so many of the criminal justice decisions are made at the local and state levels. Legal officers like(Justice, sheriffs, prosecutors, legislators voting on crime laws, have supported the "get tough" policies that makes punishment stricter for offenders.

3. High rates in crime and killings. Crime rates and killings has been on the increase in recent times due to several economic and social factors. children for broken homes are not well brought up to instll moral values that could make them responsible and add value to the society hence they are more prone to social vices

You might be interested in

What strategy is a company using when it customizes its products, promotion, and distribution to fit cultural, technological, an

german

The answer is MULTINATIONAL STRATEGY.

5 0

2 years ago

A fixed asset with a five-year estimated useful life and no scrap value is sold at the end of the second year of its useful life

JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

B) A gain would be less or a loss would be greater using straight-line depreciation.

Explanation:

In straight line method of depreciation there is a fixed amount of depreciation, and in double declining method the rate is double of straight line method,

Let us take an example,

Cost of asset = $500,000

Selling price at end of 2nd year = $300,000

Straight line depreciation = $100,000 for each year i.e. $500,000/5

Double declining method rate = ($100,000/$500,000) $\times$ 100 $\times$ 2 = 40%

Therefore value at end of second year

Straight line = $500,000 - ($100,000 $\times$ 2 ) = $300,000

Double Declining method = ($500,000 -40%) - 40% = $180,000

In case of sale at $300,000

Profit shall be

Straight line = $300,000 - $300,000 = 0

Double Declining = $300,000 - $180,000 = $120,000

Now, there will be more profit in double declining that is gain is less in straight line and losses would be greater in straight line thus statement B is correct.

8 0

3 years ago

scenarios as examples of elastic, inelastic, or unit elastic demand. When Ruko, a device used to stream movies at home, increase

kenny6666 [7]

Answer:

Elastic demand

Unit elastic demand

Inelastic demand

Explanation:

Elasticity of demand measures the degree of responsiveness of quantity demanded to changes in price.

Elasticity of demand = percentage change in quantity demanded/ percentage change in price.

Denand is elastic if when price is increased, the quantity demanded changes more than the increase in price. Quanitity demanded is more sensitive to changes in price.

If price is increased, the quantity demanded falls and as a result the total revenue earned by sellers falls.

The elasticity of demand is usually greater than 1 when demand is elastic.

Demand is unit elastic if a change in price has the same proportional change on quantity demanded. The coefficient of elasticity is equal to one.

If price is increased, the quantity demanded changes by the same proportion so there's no change in total revenue of sellers.

Demand is inelastic if a change in price has little or no effect on quantity demanded.

Coefficient of elasticity is usually less than one.

If price is increased, there is little or no change in the quantity demanded and as a result the revenue earned by sellers increase.

I hope my answer helps you

3 0

3 years ago

If Wild Widgets, Inc., were an all-equity company, it would have a beta of 0.9. The company has a target debt-equity ratio of .4

Veronika [31]

Answer:

a. 6.5%

b. 13.06%

c. 10.91%

Explanation:

Cost of debt of a bond is yield to maturity. Yield to maturity is the rate of return that a investor actually receives or a borrows actually pays on a bond. It is long term return or payment which is expressed in annual term.

Formula for yield to maturity is as follow

Yield to maturity = [ C + ( F - P ) / n ] / [ (F + P ) / 2 ]

By placing values in the formula

Assuming the bond face value is $1,000

Yield to maturity = [ (1000x7.2) + ( 1,000 - $1,090 ) / 20 ] / [ ( 1,000 + $1,090 ) / 2 ]

Yield to maturity = [ $72 + ( 1,000 - $1,090 ) / 20 ] / $1,045

Yield to maturity = [ $72 - $4.5 ] / $1,045

Yield to maturity = $67.5 / $1,045

Yield to maturity = 6.5%

So, the cost of Debt is 6.5%

As 0.9 is the unlevered beta, We need Levered beta due to restructuring of capital.

Beta Levered = Beta Unlevered x ( 1 + ( 1 - tax rate ) x Debt / Equity)

Beta Levered = 0.9 x ( 1 + ( 1 - 0.35 ) x 0.4 )

Beta Levered = 1.134

Cost of equity can be calculated using CAPM

CAPM calculated the expected return on an equity investment based on the risk free rate, market premium and risk beta of the investment.

Formula for CAPM is as follow

Expected return = Risk free Rate + Beta ( Market premium)

As we know the Risk premium is the difference of market return and risk free rate.

Expected return = Risk free Rate + Beta ( Market Return - Risk free Rate )

Ra = Rf + β ( Rm - Rf )

Ra = 4.1% + 1.134 ( 12% - 4.1% )

Ra = 13.06%

Cost of Equity is 13.06%

WACC is the average cost of capital of the firm based on the weightage of the debt and weightage of the equity multiplied to their respective costs.

According to WACC formula

WACC = ( Cost of equity x Weightage of equity )+ ( Cost of debt ( 1- t) x Weightage of debt )

Placing the values in formula

If the debt to equity 0.4 the equity value should be 1 and total capital is 1.4 ( 1 + 0.4 )

WACC = ( 13.06% x 1 / 1.4 )+ ( 6.5% ( 1- 0.35) x 0.4 / 1.4 ) = 9.71% + 1.2% = 10.91%

WACC is 10.91%

4 0

3 years ago

Draw a curve that shows the relationship between the tax rate and the amount of tax revenue collected. The relationship between

maw [93]

Answer:

Laffer curve.

Explanation:

Laffer Curve is developed by

Arthur Laffer. It is used to show the relationship between tax rates and the amount of tax revenue collected by governments of a particular country. Laffer curve is used to demonstrate Laffer’s argument that sometimes cutting tax rates can increase total tax revenue.

Laffer curve shows the relationship that occurs between the tax rate and the amount of tax revenue collected

The relationship between the tax rate and the amount of tax revenue collected is called the LAFFER CURVE curve. This curve shows that TAX CUT CAN INCREASE TAX REVENUE.

The drawing of a laffer curve has been attached

8 0

3 years ago