Answer:
She used inductive reasoning. (False)
She used the law of detachment. (True)
Her conclusion is valid. (True)
The statements can be represented as "if p, then q and if q, then r." (False)
Her conclusion is true. (True)
Step-by-step explanation:
p = Two lines are perpendicular
q = They intersect at Right angles.
Given: A and B are perpendicular
Conclusion: A and B intersect at right angle.
According to the law of detachment, There are two premises (statements that are accepted as true) and a conclusion. They must follow the pattern as shown below.
Statement 1: If p, then q.
Statement 2: p
Conclusion: q
In our case the pattern is followed. The truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion. So her conclusion is true and valid.
To pay website Alen needs to make 1 kite a day that is 7 kites.
To earn at least 900$ per week he needs to make 900$/20$=45kites
900/20+7=52 kites. Alen need to make at least 52 kites a week to earn at least 900$.
13 + 3i
15 - 6i - 2 + 9i → Sum
collect like terms
(15 - 2) + ( - 6i + 9i) =13 + 3i
