In dual federalism, both the state government and the federal government have their own jurisdiction and respect each other's jurisdictions in legislation without interfering. There is a clear difference in who deals with what and they don't intervene with one another when they are making policies. Because of this, it is also known as the layer cake federalism.
Cooperative federalism is the opposite of dual federalism. In cooperative, both the state government and the national government work together when making policies. It is called also the marble cake federalism because like the marble cake, it's all mixed and not clearly separated into layers.
An example of dual federalism in the United States can be when local, state governments, make policies regarding aid programs to people in the state. The federal government approves and allocates funds but the state can make policies regarding aid to some of its citizens independently of the federal government.
An example of cooperative federalism in the United States can be making policies regarding environmental protection. For example, the federal government can make a set of laws to protect the environment and reduce carbon dioxide emission, while a state government can create a local program that would help factories switch to clean energy in order to adhere to the law.
Answer:
polluting
apathetic
Explanation:
China is not only a leader in human right violations, they have become one of the greatest polluters in the world. They've accomished these primarily by an apathetic view of their own people, but the rest of the world. Consider that Chinese leaders are among the top wealthiest of the world. All while leading the largest COLLECTIVE culture.
I think the answer is Romans.
Hope this helps:)
The Mandate framework put the Ottoman domain under the hidden control of European forces, Britain being one of them, they meddled with the center east giving some power taking from others deceiving, and abusing for pick up. For instance Britain put lord Faisal in energy of Iraq they enabled it to be autonomous yet give certain accommodating things to Britain, in Egypt they made Egypt a protectorate despite the fact that they called it independent,stationing troops along the Suez channel, they endeavored to remove Egyptian troops from Sudan, and kept Egypt off its toes in light of a partnership with a feeble ruler, when Palestine turned into a command of Britain Jewish individuals moved to there in huge numbers to the hate of the Arabs living there, in the long run getting scorn through various routes from the two sides. While the contention wasn't unequivocally expressed as one from religious contrasts, the Christian British exploiting the Muslim Arabs for arrive power and assets while additionally providing for the Jewish individuals at that point endeavoring to increase back control from them while the Arabs and Jews were battling could be viewed as a religious clash in a turmoil filled territory.
Answer:
Answer is option B
Explanation:
If you like my answer than please mark me brainliest thanks
