Answer:
The growth of the African population was aided by the Western medicine introduced by Europeans. Africans were introduced to formal education by Europeans. They also improved the African infrastructure with the addition of road systems, railroads, water, electricity, and communication systems.
In both cases the colonizing European powers introduced new infrastructure in order to benefit themselves economically. This infrastructure was intended to increase trade by exploiting the native country for goods and easily transporting them to port cities.
From the late 1800s through the early 1900s, Western Europe pursued a policy of imperialism that became known as New Imperialism. By the 1870, it became necessary for European industrialized nations to expand their markets globally in order to sell products that they could not sell domestically on the continent.
<span>Open Door Policy (1899/1900) is declaration of principles introduced by the United States (1899, 1900) for the defense of equal freedoms amid nation’s transaction with China and in provision of Chinese regional and directorial honesty. So the answer is E. </span>
Answer:
The first is true, and so is the 3rd so I would go with all of the above.
Explanation:
Alvin York killed 20 German soldiers and almost single handedly took 132 prisoner. He is renowned for his bravery and his strong Christian Faith. Cher Ami was a French pigeon donated by the British to carry messages.
I believe the answer is: Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates
Aristotle and Plato promote the idea of political system and ethical values that later on develop into a democratic system of government that is used by most countries today.
Socrates on the other hand, believe that democracies had a lot of flaw and only a handful of selected people should be able to make the decision for the society, which is what adopted by countris with absolute monarchies.
It's clear that one of the systems does not work. Corruption and failure are not strangers to either system, but one of them has a higher success rate to prove its point.
The first argument is pretty simple. Socialism has never worked. From that view, it is pretty clear that empirical evidence suggests that socialism usually ends up turning into an oppressive pseudo capitalist corporatism, as it has happened in South America repeatedly, or it will become a dictatorship, as it has happened in South America, Africa and even to Russia and its neighbor countries.
Socialism, to work, has to have state force using firearms to impose their will upon the others. It smashes the will and freedom of minorities, and by minorities I mean anyone who disagrees with them, and forces them, with the raw and physical power of the State, to behave accordingly.
Capitalism, though, is all about competition and voluntarism when it is not infected with the corrupted politicians that ally themselves with big companies, making an ugly son that we call corporatism. But even when that is the case, people tend to have something to eat, that can't be said about current Venezuela and North Korea.
