His number line is incorrect, or he plotted the point incorrectly. We know that the numbers on a number line get bigger as we get farther and farther away from zero on both sides. So -4 being closer to zero than -2 is impossible on a perfect number line. Thus, he either needs to check his counting, or check if he plotted the right number.
5
<em><u>4</u></em>
<em><u>3</u></em>
2
1
0
-1
<em><u>-2</u></em>
-3
<em><u>-4</u></em>
-5
Distribute the .15 on the right side to get:
20 + .5x + 3 + .075x
Then, combine like terms (add numbers together and add x terms together):
.575x + 23
...and that's your final answer!
Answer:
x = 110°
Step-by-step explanation:
The sum of the interior angles of a polygon is
sum = 180° (n - 2) ← n is the number of sides
Here n = 6, thus
sum = 180° × 4 = 720°
Sum the given angles and equate to 720
125 + x + 130 + 90 + 165 + 100 = 720, that is
610 + x = 720 ( subtract 610 from both sides )
x = 110°
Option A, Yes the triangles are congruent by SAS.
Do you know what the vertical angle thereom is? If not, it pretty much means that two "vertical" angles (In this case, Angle EFD and Angle HFG) are congruent.
If the number of cheeseburgers sold was two times the number of hamburgers sold we know 1/3 of the burgers sold were hamburgers. So 240/3=80. This means 80 hamburgers were sold and 160 cheeseburgers were sold
