Answer:
TRUE
Explanation:
In the Schenck v. United States case, the US Supreme Court decided that the First Amendment could be restricted if the words spoken or printed represented a clear and present danger to society. Because of that, freedom of speech is not an absolute right, the government could restrict speech if the the words mean a clear and present danger to society.
I believe the answer is The bank secrecy Act.
Prior to this act, the government cannot (under any circumstances) force banks to Record information about any transactions made by certain organizations/individuals.
This act force the banks to made the record if the amount surpasses $10,000 in order to prevent money laundering.
Answer:
Rory's behavior is unethical.
Explanation:
Ethical behavior is a moral conscience, attributed to good conduct and individual procedures, is to act with self-determination, self-control and orderly in any situation and fundamental at all times of life.
Rory's behavior does not match the concept of ethical behavior. Ethical behavior is related to actions that involve good conduct and individual control. Even if Rory returns the money from the cashier, she's taking money that is not hers without the permission of the real owner. Taking things that are not yours without permission is not good conduct and therefore is not ethical behavior.
- the people involved, the structure of the organization,
- the technologies used and the external environment influencing the organization.
- It is impossible to run an organization without people.
<em>The organization must have a structure according to which it will run.</em>
<em>Technology helps people in working smoothly.</em>
<em>Socio-cultural, political, economical, legal and geographical factors shape an organization.</em>
The supreme court exercises the power of judicial review by declaring laws made by Congress unconstitutional.
