The statement, investor perception on the risk of bonds will raise their desired return is true.
The higher an investment's risk, the greater its potential returns should be. By contrast, a very safe and low-risk investment should generally offer low returns. So, this investor perception will raise the desired return of the risk of bonds.
Generally, the higher the potential return of an investment, the higher the risk. Thus, there is no guarantee that you will actually get a higher return by accepting more risk. In this matter diversification is useful.
Hence, you can minimize the risk by making sure the company's bond you own is not a high risk company with a high probability of paying back.
To learn more about risk of bonds here:
brainly.com/question/14850768
#SPJ4
If the price elasticity of demand for Mountain Dew is 4.4 then "mountain dew has a high price elasticity of demand".
<u>Answer:</u> Option D
<u>Explanation:</u>
In economics "Price elasticity of demand" (PED) is a metric required to illustrate the flexibility or elasticity of a product or service's required quantity to increase its value when nothing but the value of product vary. When mountain dew have price elasticity of demand is 4.4 this follows that a price increase of 10 percent would result in the quantity needed decline by 44%
as illustrated below:
4.4 = (% quantity change) / (% price change)
4.4 = x / 10
x = -4.4 (10) = -44% here negative sign shows decline in quantity required.
Answer:
The statement is true
Explanation:
As a fact, I agree that with large sample sizes, even the small differences between the null value and the observed point estimate can be statistically significant.
To put it differently, any differences between the null value and the observed point estimate will be material and/or significant if the samples are large in shape and form.
It's also established that point estimate get more clearer and understandable, and the difference between the mean and the null value can be easily singled out if the sample size is bigger.
Suffix to say, however, while the difference may connote a statistical importance, the practical implication notwithstanding, will be looked and studied on a different set of rules and procedures, beyond the statistical relevance.
We are forced to make choices in our day to day life because our resources are limited.
An example of this limited resources is our financial resources, we need to work to earn money to buy our necessities to live a comfortable life. Simply put, no work no pay. No pay, no food. No food, no life. So, no choice but work.
Who pays the tax does NOT depend on who write the check to the government.
Who pays the check ultimately depend on the elasticity of supply and demand. This is because, suppliers have several ways of passing the taxes levied on them by the government to the consumers in form of increase in price of their products. But this also depend on the elasticity of the products, because if the prices are too high, some customers may decide to buy somewhere else or to go for a substitute.<span />
