Answer:
A) The first is a prediction about a recommendation the main argument opposes; the second is a conclusion drawn in order to support the main conclusion.
Explanation:
From the argument above by the two senators, it could be seen that the two Senators are argueing in favour and argainst the Tax. Senator Baker, was of the believe that his opponent, Senator Rothmore calling for increase in taxes to fund programs helps the long-term unemployed.
His argument was based soley on the unemployed without factoring in the small businesses that would be killed off as a result of the tax increment. The fall of small businesses would definitely affect the prediction he made about unemployed getting work. This is because, those unemployed can only work by the opportunities created by the small businesses.
Senator Baker only made the second conclusion inorder to support his argument on the need to lower taxes which would drive job creations thereby being a win-win situation for both the government and the citizens.
You posted the same question twice just letting ya know so you don’t loose points
Some counties have been merged meaning you have a city with
a municipality and a county that acts as an extension of the state that
characteristics of both which called consolidated city counties. Then you have the county equivalents where there
are no counties but there are city type governments that exist or independent cities with no counties while
some are outside the jurisdiction of counties.
Answer:
<em>Signal detection theory </em>
Explanation:
<em>In psychology,</em><em> signal detection theory is also referred to as detection theory and it is described as a phenomenon to measure of identifying the capability of a person to differentiate between random patterns and information-bearing patterns that tend to distract from a piece of particular information.</em>
<em>In other words, </em><em>it is described as a state in which the detection of a specific stimulus depends on the psychological or physical state of the person as well as the intensity of the given stimulus.</em>
<em>In reference to the question, Dr Richardson is most likely an advocate the signal detection theory.</em>
Answer:
Low-balling
Explanation:
There are four different methods of compliance (persuasion techniques) in psychology, including:
1. Foot-in-the-Door Technique.
2. Door-in-the-Face Technique.
3. Low-Balling.
4. Norm of Reciprocity.
Low-balling: In psychology, the term low-balling is referred to as a persuasion technique that involves an item being offered at a lower price initially to convince the buyer to buy that item and then the price of that particular item gets increased.
In the question above, the statement signifies the use of the low-balling technique.
