Health care has always been a highly debated issue for several reasons. The first one is whether it should be controlled by each state or the federal government and the solution to the debate could be that every state were able to control their local health care programs but with a federal agency to supervise it. This takes us to the next issue; Politicians argue that no single healthcare program will cover all Americans. And they have a valid point, but if every state could create and control their local health care programs, it would be easier to reach a wider number of citizens with a health care program. The next issue of the debate is whether those programs should affect tax rates, and of course they would, but only at a local level, not at the federal level. The last point of the debate is that the medical professionals are opposed to such programs. Of course they are against it, nowadays medical attention costs a fortune, and doctors receive great sums of money for their services. There should be a balance in the cost health care, I am not suggesting that it should be free for everybody, only to the most needed ones.
Answer:
I think B but Im not completely Sure?
Explanation:
Your Welcome!
Answered By: TrinTrinPrinted
Sexual orientation is not an indicator of mental health.
There is no evidence that environmental influences determine sexual orientation.
Evidence for biological influences includes
the presence of same-sex attraction;
straight-gay differences in body and brain characteristics;
higher rates in certain families and in identical twins;
exposure to certain hormones during critical periods of prenatal development;
and the fraternal birth-order effect.
cite: www.uucnc.org
