I'm sure its a persons life
Answer:
WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT SLAVERY ANYWAYS
Explanation:
The delegates compromised. Each slave would count as three-fifths of a person. ... A special committee worked out another compromise: Congress would have the power to ban the slave trade, but not until 1800. The convention voted to extend the date to 1808.
Angkor was a center for organization and the love of a heavenly ruler. The city was arranged and built based on strict and political originations imported from India and adjusted to nearby customs.
The immense arrangement of repositories, waterways, and channels, which was the most remarkable highlights of Angkor, served principally as a method for water control and rice water system, although it likewise spoke to the waters of the universe.
Answer:
<em>to</em><em> </em><em>repress</em><em> </em><em>blacks</em><em> </em><em>at</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>expense</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>whites</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>increase</em><em> </em><em>their</em><em> </em><em>political</em><em> </em><em>power</em><em> </em>
In Schenck v. the United States (1919), the Supreme Court ruled that criticism of the draft was NOT protected by the First Amendment, because it created a clear and present danger to American interests.
- In the Schenk v. US case, which concerns the freedom of speech issue, Schenk urged Americans to forgo the World War I draft.
- The Supreme Court concluded in Schenck v. the United States that the First Amendment did not apply to criticism of the draft because it posed a clear and present danger to American interests.
- The U.S. Supreme Court heard a First Amendment challenge to federal legislation on free speech grounds for the first time in this case.
Learn about more Supreme Court here
brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ4
